A comparison of simple analytical methods for determination of fluoride in microlitre-volume plasma samples

Fatemeh Zohoori, Anne Maguire, E. A. Martinez-Mier, M Buzalaf, R Sanderson, G. J. Eckert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim was to compare potential methods for fluoride analysis in microlitre-volume plasma samples containing nano-gram amounts of fluoride. Methods: A group of four laboratories analysed a set of standardised biological samples as well as plasma to determine fluoride concentration using three methods. In Phase-1, fluoride analysis was carried out using the established HMDS-diffusion method (1ml-aliquot/analysis) to obtain preliminary measurement of agreement between the laboratories. In Phase-2, the laboratories analysed the same samples using a micro-diffusion method and knownaddition technique with 200μl-aliquot/analysis. Coefficients of Variation (CVs) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated using ANOVA to evaluate the amount of variation within- and between-laboratories. Based on the results of the Phase-2 analysis, 20 human plasma samples were analysed and compared using the HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique in Phase-3. Results: Comparison of Phase-1 results showed no statistically significant difference among the laboratories for the overall data set. The mean between- and within-laboratory CVs and ICCs were <0.13 and ≥0.99, respectively, indicating very low variability and excellent reliability. In Phase-2, the overall results for between-laboratory variability showed a poor CV (1.16) and ICC (0.44) for the micro-diffusion method, whereas with the known-addition technique the corresponding values were 0.49 and 0.83. Phase-3 results showed no statistically significant difference in fluoride concentrations of the plasma samples measured with HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique, with a mean (SE) difference of 0.002(0.003) μg/ml. In conclusion, the known-addition technique could be a suitable alternative for measurement of fluoride in plasma with microlitre-volume samples.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-283
JournalCaries Research
Volume53
Issue number3
Early online date8 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Plasma Volume
Fluorides
Analysis of Variance

Cite this

Zohoori, Fatemeh ; Maguire, Anne ; Martinez-Mier, E. A. ; Buzalaf, M ; Sanderson, R ; Eckert, G. J. / A comparison of simple analytical methods for determination of fluoride in microlitre-volume plasma samples. In: Caries Research. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 3. pp. 275-283.
@article{7911c626b79f4fbe9dace2e109438e2e,
title = "A comparison of simple analytical methods for determination of fluoride in microlitre-volume plasma samples",
abstract = "The aim was to compare potential methods for fluoride analysis in microlitre-volume plasma samples containing nano-gram amounts of fluoride. Methods: A group of four laboratories analysed a set of standardised biological samples as well as plasma to determine fluoride concentration using three methods. In Phase-1, fluoride analysis was carried out using the established HMDS-diffusion method (1ml-aliquot/analysis) to obtain preliminary measurement of agreement between the laboratories. In Phase-2, the laboratories analysed the same samples using a micro-diffusion method and knownaddition technique with 200μl-aliquot/analysis. Coefficients of Variation (CVs) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated using ANOVA to evaluate the amount of variation within- and between-laboratories. Based on the results of the Phase-2 analysis, 20 human plasma samples were analysed and compared using the HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique in Phase-3. Results: Comparison of Phase-1 results showed no statistically significant difference among the laboratories for the overall data set. The mean between- and within-laboratory CVs and ICCs were <0.13 and ≥0.99, respectively, indicating very low variability and excellent reliability. In Phase-2, the overall results for between-laboratory variability showed a poor CV (1.16) and ICC (0.44) for the micro-diffusion method, whereas with the known-addition technique the corresponding values were 0.49 and 0.83. Phase-3 results showed no statistically significant difference in fluoride concentrations of the plasma samples measured with HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique, with a mean (SE) difference of 0.002(0.003) μg/ml. In conclusion, the known-addition technique could be a suitable alternative for measurement of fluoride in plasma with microlitre-volume samples.",
author = "Fatemeh Zohoori and Anne Maguire and Martinez-Mier, {E. A.} and M Buzalaf and R Sanderson and Eckert, {G. J.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1159/000492339",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "275--283",
journal = "Caries Research",
issn = "0008-6568",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "3",

}

Zohoori, F, Maguire, A, Martinez-Mier, EA, Buzalaf, M, Sanderson, R & Eckert, GJ 2019, 'A comparison of simple analytical methods for determination of fluoride in microlitre-volume plasma samples', Caries Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492339

A comparison of simple analytical methods for determination of fluoride in microlitre-volume plasma samples. / Zohoori, Fatemeh; Maguire, Anne; Martinez-Mier, E. A.; Buzalaf, M; Sanderson, R; Eckert, G. J.

In: Caries Research, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2019, p. 275-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of simple analytical methods for determination of fluoride in microlitre-volume plasma samples

AU - Zohoori, Fatemeh

AU - Maguire, Anne

AU - Martinez-Mier, E. A.

AU - Buzalaf, M

AU - Sanderson, R

AU - Eckert, G. J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The aim was to compare potential methods for fluoride analysis in microlitre-volume plasma samples containing nano-gram amounts of fluoride. Methods: A group of four laboratories analysed a set of standardised biological samples as well as plasma to determine fluoride concentration using three methods. In Phase-1, fluoride analysis was carried out using the established HMDS-diffusion method (1ml-aliquot/analysis) to obtain preliminary measurement of agreement between the laboratories. In Phase-2, the laboratories analysed the same samples using a micro-diffusion method and knownaddition technique with 200μl-aliquot/analysis. Coefficients of Variation (CVs) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated using ANOVA to evaluate the amount of variation within- and between-laboratories. Based on the results of the Phase-2 analysis, 20 human plasma samples were analysed and compared using the HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique in Phase-3. Results: Comparison of Phase-1 results showed no statistically significant difference among the laboratories for the overall data set. The mean between- and within-laboratory CVs and ICCs were <0.13 and ≥0.99, respectively, indicating very low variability and excellent reliability. In Phase-2, the overall results for between-laboratory variability showed a poor CV (1.16) and ICC (0.44) for the micro-diffusion method, whereas with the known-addition technique the corresponding values were 0.49 and 0.83. Phase-3 results showed no statistically significant difference in fluoride concentrations of the plasma samples measured with HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique, with a mean (SE) difference of 0.002(0.003) μg/ml. In conclusion, the known-addition technique could be a suitable alternative for measurement of fluoride in plasma with microlitre-volume samples.

AB - The aim was to compare potential methods for fluoride analysis in microlitre-volume plasma samples containing nano-gram amounts of fluoride. Methods: A group of four laboratories analysed a set of standardised biological samples as well as plasma to determine fluoride concentration using three methods. In Phase-1, fluoride analysis was carried out using the established HMDS-diffusion method (1ml-aliquot/analysis) to obtain preliminary measurement of agreement between the laboratories. In Phase-2, the laboratories analysed the same samples using a micro-diffusion method and knownaddition technique with 200μl-aliquot/analysis. Coefficients of Variation (CVs) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were estimated using ANOVA to evaluate the amount of variation within- and between-laboratories. Based on the results of the Phase-2 analysis, 20 human plasma samples were analysed and compared using the HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique in Phase-3. Results: Comparison of Phase-1 results showed no statistically significant difference among the laboratories for the overall data set. The mean between- and within-laboratory CVs and ICCs were <0.13 and ≥0.99, respectively, indicating very low variability and excellent reliability. In Phase-2, the overall results for between-laboratory variability showed a poor CV (1.16) and ICC (0.44) for the micro-diffusion method, whereas with the known-addition technique the corresponding values were 0.49 and 0.83. Phase-3 results showed no statistically significant difference in fluoride concentrations of the plasma samples measured with HMDS-diffusion method and known-addition technique, with a mean (SE) difference of 0.002(0.003) μg/ml. In conclusion, the known-addition technique could be a suitable alternative for measurement of fluoride in plasma with microlitre-volume samples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054809721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000492339

DO - 10.1159/000492339

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 275

EP - 283

JO - Caries Research

JF - Caries Research

SN - 0008-6568

IS - 3

ER -