TY - JOUR
T1 - A thematic analysis of UK healthy planning frameworks and tools designed to support the inclusion of health in urban planning
AU - De La Haye, Amber
AU - Gow, Ruth
AU - Lake, Amelia A.
AU - Ball, Caitlin
AU - van Herk, Sebastiaan
AU - Rofin Serra, Marta
AU - Jones, Andy
AU - Chang, Michael
AU - Moore, Helen J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024/6/13
Y1 - 2024/6/13
N2 - While there are a number of frameworks and tools available to support the integration of health into urban planning, they have not been systematically evaluated. With health increasingly on the planning agenda, it is crucial to understand the role frameworks play and how they can best be designed/used to support the integration of health in urban planning. We conducted a thematic analysis, drawing on desk research and semi-structured interviews, of seven UK urban planning frameworks and tools designed to integrate health considerations into planning, to identify information on the challenges, considerations, and best practices of framework design and implementation. Through thematic analysis, shared challenges, best practices, and considerations for success were identified in the following themes: framework design and conceptualisation, framework recommendations and content, implementation outcomes and impact, framework evaluations, and general challenges. Main findings included the need to consult all relevant stakeholders, especially communities, developers, and local authorities, to design a useful framework. Simple, clear recommendations aligning with relevant policies around place and health were useful for enabling framework take-up. While anecdotally frameworks were found to facilitate conversations with local communities, data on framework impact was lacking, suggesting better evaluation of framework use would be beneficial in future.
AB - While there are a number of frameworks and tools available to support the integration of health into urban planning, they have not been systematically evaluated. With health increasingly on the planning agenda, it is crucial to understand the role frameworks play and how they can best be designed/used to support the integration of health in urban planning. We conducted a thematic analysis, drawing on desk research and semi-structured interviews, of seven UK urban planning frameworks and tools designed to integrate health considerations into planning, to identify information on the challenges, considerations, and best practices of framework design and implementation. Through thematic analysis, shared challenges, best practices, and considerations for success were identified in the following themes: framework design and conceptualisation, framework recommendations and content, implementation outcomes and impact, framework evaluations, and general challenges. Main findings included the need to consult all relevant stakeholders, especially communities, developers, and local authorities, to design a useful framework. Simple, clear recommendations aligning with relevant policies around place and health were useful for enabling framework take-up. While anecdotally frameworks were found to facilitate conversations with local communities, data on framework impact was lacking, suggesting better evaluation of framework use would be beneficial in future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195927870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/59a3bc33-e882-3304-8748-cdade58104c3/
U2 - 10.1080/23748834.2024.2353963
DO - 10.1080/23748834.2024.2353963
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85195927870
SN - 2374-8834
VL - 8
SP - 956
EP - 972
JO - Cities and Health
JF - Cities and Health
IS - 5
ER -