Abstract
This structured critical review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) systems foster multidimensional
student engagement—behavioral, cognitive, emotional, social, and agentic—in contemporary learning
environments. Using a PRISMA-informed process, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE
Xplore, and ACM Digital Library for diverse English-language studies (2020–2025). Eighty-eight records
were identified; 48 were screened for descriptive trends and 26 were synthesized. We map major AI classes
(intelligent tutoring systems, learning analytics, generative AI, affective computing) to engagement
mechanisms and associated features (adaptivity, feedback, dialogue agents, dashboards, affect sensing).
Evidence shows AI most consistently strengthens cognitive and behavioral engagement through guidance,
personalization, and analytics-driven support, while emotional engagement remains underdeveloped and
inconsistently evaluated. We argue that generative AI can scale agentic engagement via learner-initiated
prompting, co-creation, and self-regulation, but amplifies risks including hallucination, overreliance,
academic integrity, privacy, and bias. We conclude with a human-in-the-loop framework and systemic AI
literacy to align innovation with ethical governance.
student engagement—behavioral, cognitive, emotional, social, and agentic—in contemporary learning
environments. Using a PRISMA-informed process, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE
Xplore, and ACM Digital Library for diverse English-language studies (2020–2025). Eighty-eight records
were identified; 48 were screened for descriptive trends and 26 were synthesized. We map major AI classes
(intelligent tutoring systems, learning analytics, generative AI, affective computing) to engagement
mechanisms and associated features (adaptivity, feedback, dialogue agents, dashboards, affect sensing).
Evidence shows AI most consistently strengthens cognitive and behavioral engagement through guidance,
personalization, and analytics-driven support, while emotional engagement remains underdeveloped and
inconsistently evaluated. We argue that generative AI can scale agentic engagement via learner-initiated
prompting, co-creation, and self-regulation, but amplifies risks including hallucination, overreliance,
academic integrity, privacy, and bias. We conclude with a human-in-the-loop framework and systemic AI
literacy to align innovation with ethical governance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jan 2026 |
| Event | Future Facing Learning and AI in Higher Education 2026 - Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom Duration: 15 Apr 2026 → 17 Apr 2026 https://www.tees.ac.uk/landing/ffl/index.cfm |
Conference
| Conference | Future Facing Learning and AI in Higher Education 2026 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | FFL26 |
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Middlesbrough |
| Period | 15/04/26 → 17/04/26 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'AI-Enhanced Pedagogy: A Critical Review of Intelligent Systems for Fostering Multidimensional Student Engagement.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver