An Approach to Linking Reforms in Security and Justice Sectors in Post-War Environments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Security sector reform (SSR) emerged as a strategy in postconflict states during the late 1990s, driven by development donors, international organizations and other international affairs consultants which have been accepted by policymakers, development practitioners and security experts. Primarily, SSR aims to strengthen, professionalize, discipline and democratize security forces: the national army and state police. However, SSR has faced many challenges. SSR in transitional administrations such as Kosovo and East Timor in 1999 and Afghanistan in 2002 has been dominated by the international community leading such processes. As a result, the international community and international donors have heavily focused on professionalizing the security forces under externally driven programs. This practice has failed to adopt a holistic vision of SSR. Less investment in the judicial sector has made the whole process counterproductive. This article argues that SSR has three pitfalls. SSR focuses on physical security; is externally driven and compartmentalized. The rule of law and justice, otherwise justice sector reform (JSR) needs to be injected into SSR to benefit a more sustainable peacebuilding program.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)125-153
Number of pages29
JournalInquiry & Insight
Volume3
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

security sector
justice
reform
East-Timor
Kosovo
International Organizations
constitutional state
Afghanistan
community
military
police
expert

Cite this

@article{aa6e645a3b844c1ba22223a00f760ec6,
title = "An Approach to Linking Reforms in Security and Justice Sectors in Post-War Environments",
abstract = "Security sector reform (SSR) emerged as a strategy in postconflict states during the late 1990s, driven by development donors, international organizations and other international affairs consultants which have been accepted by policymakers, development practitioners and security experts. Primarily, SSR aims to strengthen, professionalize, discipline and democratize security forces: the national army and state police. However, SSR has faced many challenges. SSR in transitional administrations such as Kosovo and East Timor in 1999 and Afghanistan in 2002 has been dominated by the international community leading such processes. As a result, the international community and international donors have heavily focused on professionalizing the security forces under externally driven programs. This practice has failed to adopt a holistic vision of SSR. Less investment in the judicial sector has made the whole process counterproductive. This article argues that SSR has three pitfalls. SSR focuses on physical security; is externally driven and compartmentalized. The rule of law and justice, otherwise justice sector reform (JSR) needs to be injected into SSR to benefit a more sustainable peacebuilding program.",
author = "Danny Singh",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "125--153",
journal = "Inquiry & Insight",
publisher = "University of Waterloo",
number = "1",

}

An Approach to Linking Reforms in Security and Justice Sectors in Post-War Environments. / Singh, Danny.

In: Inquiry & Insight , Vol. 3, No. 1, 7, 2010, p. 125-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Approach to Linking Reforms in Security and Justice Sectors in Post-War Environments

AU - Singh, Danny

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Security sector reform (SSR) emerged as a strategy in postconflict states during the late 1990s, driven by development donors, international organizations and other international affairs consultants which have been accepted by policymakers, development practitioners and security experts. Primarily, SSR aims to strengthen, professionalize, discipline and democratize security forces: the national army and state police. However, SSR has faced many challenges. SSR in transitional administrations such as Kosovo and East Timor in 1999 and Afghanistan in 2002 has been dominated by the international community leading such processes. As a result, the international community and international donors have heavily focused on professionalizing the security forces under externally driven programs. This practice has failed to adopt a holistic vision of SSR. Less investment in the judicial sector has made the whole process counterproductive. This article argues that SSR has three pitfalls. SSR focuses on physical security; is externally driven and compartmentalized. The rule of law and justice, otherwise justice sector reform (JSR) needs to be injected into SSR to benefit a more sustainable peacebuilding program.

AB - Security sector reform (SSR) emerged as a strategy in postconflict states during the late 1990s, driven by development donors, international organizations and other international affairs consultants which have been accepted by policymakers, development practitioners and security experts. Primarily, SSR aims to strengthen, professionalize, discipline and democratize security forces: the national army and state police. However, SSR has faced many challenges. SSR in transitional administrations such as Kosovo and East Timor in 1999 and Afghanistan in 2002 has been dominated by the international community leading such processes. As a result, the international community and international donors have heavily focused on professionalizing the security forces under externally driven programs. This practice has failed to adopt a holistic vision of SSR. Less investment in the judicial sector has made the whole process counterproductive. This article argues that SSR has three pitfalls. SSR focuses on physical security; is externally driven and compartmentalized. The rule of law and justice, otherwise justice sector reform (JSR) needs to be injected into SSR to benefit a more sustainable peacebuilding program.

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 125

EP - 153

JO - Inquiry & Insight

JF - Inquiry & Insight

IS - 1

M1 - 7

ER -