TY - JOUR
T1 - An overview of thermal necrosis
T2 - present and future
AU - Mediouni, Mohamed
AU - Kucklick, Theodore
AU - Poncet, Sébastien
AU - Madiouni, Riadh
AU - Abouaomar, Amine
AU - Madry, Henning
AU - Cucchiarini, Magali
AU - Chopko, Bohdan
AU - Vaughan, Neil
AU - Arora, Manit
AU - Gökkuş, Kemal
AU - Lozoya Lara, Mario
AU - Paiva Cedeño, Lorenlay
AU - Volosnikov, Alexander
AU - Hesmati, Mohamed
AU - Ho, Kevin
PY - 2019/5/10
Y1 - 2019/5/10
N2 - Introduction: Many orthopaedic procedures require drilling of bone, especially fracture repair cases. Bone drilling results in heat generation due to the friction between the bone and the drill bit. A high-level of heat generation kills bone cells. Bone cell death results in resorption of bone around bone screws. Methods: We searched in the literature for data on parameters that influence drilling bone and could lead to thermal necrosis. The points of view of many orthopaedists and neurosurgeons based upon on previous practices and clinical experience are presented. Results: Several potential complications that lead to thermal necrosis are discussed and highlighted. Discussion: Even in the face of growing evidence as to the negative effects of heat induction during drilling, simple and effective methods for monitoring and cooling in real-time are not in widespread usage today. For that purpose, we propose some suggestions for the future of bone drilling, taking note of recent advances in autonomous robotics, intelligent systems and computer simulation techniques. Conclusions: These advances in prevention of thermal necrosis during bone drilling surgery are expected to reduce the risk of patient injury and costs for the health service.
AB - Introduction: Many orthopaedic procedures require drilling of bone, especially fracture repair cases. Bone drilling results in heat generation due to the friction between the bone and the drill bit. A high-level of heat generation kills bone cells. Bone cell death results in resorption of bone around bone screws. Methods: We searched in the literature for data on parameters that influence drilling bone and could lead to thermal necrosis. The points of view of many orthopaedists and neurosurgeons based upon on previous practices and clinical experience are presented. Results: Several potential complications that lead to thermal necrosis are discussed and highlighted. Discussion: Even in the face of growing evidence as to the negative effects of heat induction during drilling, simple and effective methods for monitoring and cooling in real-time are not in widespread usage today. For that purpose, we propose some suggestions for the future of bone drilling, taking note of recent advances in autonomous robotics, intelligent systems and computer simulation techniques. Conclusions: These advances in prevention of thermal necrosis during bone drilling surgery are expected to reduce the risk of patient injury and costs for the health service.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070764628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03007995.2019.1603671
DO - 10.1080/03007995.2019.1603671
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30943796
AN - SCOPUS:85070764628
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 35
SP - 1555
EP - 1562
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 9
ER -