Are you measuring the impacts and outcomes of your professional doctorate programme?

R. Mcsherry, J. Bettany-saltikov, Elizabeth Cummings, Kim Walker, Karen Ford, Killian Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to report some of the research findings from a workshop held at an International Professional Doctorate Conference. The workshop aimed to elicit the views of attendees surrounding the following questions: How do you currently measure the impact and outcome of your professional doctorate programme(s)? What tools, frameworks, benchmarks, guidelines do you know currently exist? How could we better measure the impact and outcome of the professional doctorate programme(s)? A qualitative research design was applied. Thirty self-selecting participants attended the workshop. Thematic Analysis identified 31 organisational themes and 5 global themes. These related to (1) defining and operationalising the terms impact and outcome for professional doctorate programmes (PDP); (2) Recognising and respecting the difference, diversity and variety of impact and outcome measures; (3) Designing a 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation; (4) Sharing and Dissemination post-completion; (5) Recognising formal and informal external validation. The originality and significance of this research is in sequencing the impact and outcome measures of professional doctorate programmes and in identifying the approaches that could be taken to track and evaluate a programme both before, during and on completion. Furthermore, the newly devised 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation is original in two ways. It incorporates the personal, organisational, professional and employer (POPE) approach and also acknowledges the importance of a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation, pre, throughout and beyond the programme.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalStudies in Continuing Education
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

stakeholder approach
evaluation
research planning
qualitative research
employer

Cite this

Mcsherry, R. ; Bettany-saltikov, J. ; Cummings, Elizabeth ; Walker, Kim ; Ford, Karen ; Walsh, Killian. / Are you measuring the impacts and outcomes of your professional doctorate programme?. In: Studies in Continuing Education. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 1-19.
@article{be172694b94c4984abd7608b433de6ae,
title = "Are you measuring the impacts and outcomes of your professional doctorate programme?",
abstract = "The aim of the paper is to report some of the research findings from a workshop held at an International Professional Doctorate Conference. The workshop aimed to elicit the views of attendees surrounding the following questions: How do you currently measure the impact and outcome of your professional doctorate programme(s)? What tools, frameworks, benchmarks, guidelines do you know currently exist? How could we better measure the impact and outcome of the professional doctorate programme(s)? A qualitative research design was applied. Thirty self-selecting participants attended the workshop. Thematic Analysis identified 31 organisational themes and 5 global themes. These related to (1) defining and operationalising the terms impact and outcome for professional doctorate programmes (PDP); (2) Recognising and respecting the difference, diversity and variety of impact and outcome measures; (3) Designing a 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation; (4) Sharing and Dissemination post-completion; (5) Recognising formal and informal external validation. The originality and significance of this research is in sequencing the impact and outcome measures of professional doctorate programmes and in identifying the approaches that could be taken to track and evaluate a programme both before, during and on completion. Furthermore, the newly devised 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation is original in two ways. It incorporates the personal, organisational, professional and employer (POPE) approach and also acknowledges the importance of a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation, pre, throughout and beyond the programme.",
author = "R. Mcsherry and J. Bettany-saltikov and Elizabeth Cummings and Kim Walker and Karen Ford and Killian Walsh",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/0158037X.2018.1555801",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Studies in Continuing Education",
issn = "0158-037X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Are you measuring the impacts and outcomes of your professional doctorate programme? / Mcsherry, R.; Bettany-saltikov, J.; Cummings, Elizabeth; Walker, Kim; Ford, Karen; Walsh, Killian.

In: Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 41, No. 2, 30.01.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are you measuring the impacts and outcomes of your professional doctorate programme?

AU - Mcsherry, R.

AU - Bettany-saltikov, J.

AU - Cummings, Elizabeth

AU - Walker, Kim

AU - Ford, Karen

AU - Walsh, Killian

PY - 2019/1/30

Y1 - 2019/1/30

N2 - The aim of the paper is to report some of the research findings from a workshop held at an International Professional Doctorate Conference. The workshop aimed to elicit the views of attendees surrounding the following questions: How do you currently measure the impact and outcome of your professional doctorate programme(s)? What tools, frameworks, benchmarks, guidelines do you know currently exist? How could we better measure the impact and outcome of the professional doctorate programme(s)? A qualitative research design was applied. Thirty self-selecting participants attended the workshop. Thematic Analysis identified 31 organisational themes and 5 global themes. These related to (1) defining and operationalising the terms impact and outcome for professional doctorate programmes (PDP); (2) Recognising and respecting the difference, diversity and variety of impact and outcome measures; (3) Designing a 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation; (4) Sharing and Dissemination post-completion; (5) Recognising formal and informal external validation. The originality and significance of this research is in sequencing the impact and outcome measures of professional doctorate programmes and in identifying the approaches that could be taken to track and evaluate a programme both before, during and on completion. Furthermore, the newly devised 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation is original in two ways. It incorporates the personal, organisational, professional and employer (POPE) approach and also acknowledges the importance of a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation, pre, throughout and beyond the programme.

AB - The aim of the paper is to report some of the research findings from a workshop held at an International Professional Doctorate Conference. The workshop aimed to elicit the views of attendees surrounding the following questions: How do you currently measure the impact and outcome of your professional doctorate programme(s)? What tools, frameworks, benchmarks, guidelines do you know currently exist? How could we better measure the impact and outcome of the professional doctorate programme(s)? A qualitative research design was applied. Thirty self-selecting participants attended the workshop. Thematic Analysis identified 31 organisational themes and 5 global themes. These related to (1) defining and operationalising the terms impact and outcome for professional doctorate programmes (PDP); (2) Recognising and respecting the difference, diversity and variety of impact and outcome measures; (3) Designing a 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation; (4) Sharing and Dissemination post-completion; (5) Recognising formal and informal external validation. The originality and significance of this research is in sequencing the impact and outcome measures of professional doctorate programmes and in identifying the approaches that could be taken to track and evaluate a programme both before, during and on completion. Furthermore, the newly devised 360° stakeholder approach to PDP evaluation is original in two ways. It incorporates the personal, organisational, professional and employer (POPE) approach and also acknowledges the importance of a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation, pre, throughout and beyond the programme.

U2 - 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1555801

DO - 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1555801

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Studies in Continuing Education

JF - Studies in Continuing Education

SN - 0158-037X

IS - 2

ER -