Banks’ capital buffers, risk, and efficiency in emerging economies: are they counter-cyclical?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship of banks’ capital buffers, risk and efficiency adjustments with cyclical movements. Empirically, we have used dynamic panel data from 461 banks of the BRICS countries (i.e., Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) for the period 2007–2015 and we also have empirically included Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) to measure the efficiency. In contrast to the consequence of past investigations, this examination additionally affirms the noteworthy effect of macroeconomic fluctuations on the determination of capital buffers, risk and efficiency. The key results of five big emerging countries are as follows: (1) capital buffers of Russia, India, China, and South Africa behave counter-cyclically while it is pro-cyclical for Brazilian banks over the business cycle; (2) there is an anti-cyclical (pro-cyclical) and significant relation between risk (stability) and business cycle for four countries and no significant relation for South Africa; (3) it shows pro-cyclicality of bank’s efficiency except for South African banks; and (4) notably, the adjustment speed of capital buffers is higher for Chinese and Indian banks than Brazilian, Russian and South African banks. Finally, it provides some policy implications for the emerging economies regarding capital buffers, risk, and efficiency adjustment decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-492
Number of pages26
JournalEurasian Economic Review
Volume9
Issue number4
Early online date10 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Eurasia Business and Economics Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Banks’ capital buffers, risk, and efficiency in emerging economies: are they counter-cyclical?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this