Beyond opposition and acceptance: examining public perceptions of the environmental and health impacts of unconventional oil and gas extraction

Matthew Cotton, Ioan Charnley-Parry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This review of public perceptions of unconventional oil and gas (UOG) exploration identifies four main types of study. First, UOG is analysed in terms of specific environmental and public health impacts. Second, by examining socio-economic impacts (namely the development of energy boom-towns). Third, in terms of the relationship between prior knowledge of UOG technology and public attitudes of support or opposition. Fourth, in terms of framing and discursive analysis of UOG by stakeholder groups including the print media. We identify a specific knowledge gap for environmental health professionals: that research is needed into how public and environmental health messages can be best communicated to diverse communities potentially affected by fracking, in order to directly improve public health outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-13
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond opposition and acceptance: examining public perceptions of the environmental and health impacts of unconventional oil and gas extraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this