Challenges in comparing knowledge exchange practices across five centres of excellence in public health research

Peter Van Der Graaf, Oliver Francis, E. Barrett, Graham Docherty

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This case study demonstrates the importance of knowledge exchange in public health research. The study compares different approaches to knowledge exchange between five Centres of Excellence in Public Health Research. As six communications and knowledge exchange professionals working across different universities and public health organizations, we faced challenges in sharing and comparing our experiences. By applying a comparative case study methodology using a conceptual model, we were able to collectively reflect on our experiences and to distinguish between different dimensions in each case study that helped us to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Our comparison shows the benefits and challenges of working collaboratively with policy and practice partners in research and provides suggestions for linking a range of activities that engage policymakers at different levels, intensities, and points in their decision-making processes to build relationships (structural approach).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Methods
Subtitle of host publicationCases
PublisherSAGE Publications
ISBN (Electronic)9781529709933
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Publication series

Name SAGE Research Methods Cases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges in comparing knowledge exchange practices across five centres of excellence in public health research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this