Compassion: hard to define, impossible to mandate

Raymond Chadwick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since Robert Francis QC’s report of 2013 on the inquiry at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, the word “compassion” has taken on new significance. Its exact meaning may not be obvious, but clearly it’s a good thing, and we need more of it. Francis wrote that patients “must receive effective services from caring, compassionate and committed staff working within a common culture.”[1] In relation to training nurses he called for “an increased focus . . . on the practical requirements of delivering compassionate care.” This, he opined, would require aptitude tests for compassion during selection, training supported by national standards in “fundamental aspects of compassionate care,” and “leadership which constantly reinforces . . . standards of compassionate care.” So we now have “values based recruitment,”[2] an e-learning programme called Compassion in Practice,[3] and the “6 Cs”—care, compassion, competence, communication, courage, and commitment—as a vision for nurses, midwives, and care staff.[4]
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)-
JournalBMJ
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Aptitude Tests
Nurse Midwives
Standard of Care
Mental Competency
Nurses
Communication
Learning
Courage

Cite this

Chadwick, Raymond. / Compassion: hard to define, impossible to mandate. In: BMJ. 2015 ; pp. -.
@article{94c69c88fa5b4c2ebffb4878b3dca205,
title = "Compassion: hard to define, impossible to mandate",
abstract = "Since Robert Francis QC’s report of 2013 on the inquiry at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, the word “compassion” has taken on new significance. Its exact meaning may not be obvious, but clearly it’s a good thing, and we need more of it. Francis wrote that patients “must receive effective services from caring, compassionate and committed staff working within a common culture.”[1] In relation to training nurses he called for “an increased focus . . . on the practical requirements of delivering compassionate care.” This, he opined, would require aptitude tests for compassion during selection, training supported by national standards in “fundamental aspects of compassionate care,” and “leadership which constantly reinforces . . . standards of compassionate care.” So we now have “values based recruitment,”[2] an e-learning programme called Compassion in Practice,[3] and the “6 Cs”—care, compassion, competence, communication, courage, and commitment—as a vision for nurses, midwives, and care staff.[4]",
author = "Raymond Chadwick",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.h3991",
language = "English",
pages = "--",
journal = "BMJ",
issn = "0959-8138",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

Compassion: hard to define, impossible to mandate. / Chadwick, Raymond.

In: BMJ, 29.07.2015, p. -.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compassion: hard to define, impossible to mandate

AU - Chadwick, Raymond

PY - 2015/7/29

Y1 - 2015/7/29

N2 - Since Robert Francis QC’s report of 2013 on the inquiry at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, the word “compassion” has taken on new significance. Its exact meaning may not be obvious, but clearly it’s a good thing, and we need more of it. Francis wrote that patients “must receive effective services from caring, compassionate and committed staff working within a common culture.”[1] In relation to training nurses he called for “an increased focus . . . on the practical requirements of delivering compassionate care.” This, he opined, would require aptitude tests for compassion during selection, training supported by national standards in “fundamental aspects of compassionate care,” and “leadership which constantly reinforces . . . standards of compassionate care.” So we now have “values based recruitment,”[2] an e-learning programme called Compassion in Practice,[3] and the “6 Cs”—care, compassion, competence, communication, courage, and commitment—as a vision for nurses, midwives, and care staff.[4]

AB - Since Robert Francis QC’s report of 2013 on the inquiry at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, the word “compassion” has taken on new significance. Its exact meaning may not be obvious, but clearly it’s a good thing, and we need more of it. Francis wrote that patients “must receive effective services from caring, compassionate and committed staff working within a common culture.”[1] In relation to training nurses he called for “an increased focus . . . on the practical requirements of delivering compassionate care.” This, he opined, would require aptitude tests for compassion during selection, training supported by national standards in “fundamental aspects of compassionate care,” and “leadership which constantly reinforces . . . standards of compassionate care.” So we now have “values based recruitment,”[2] an e-learning programme called Compassion in Practice,[3] and the “6 Cs”—care, compassion, competence, communication, courage, and commitment—as a vision for nurses, midwives, and care staff.[4]

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.h3991

DO - 10.1136/bmj.h3991

M3 - Article

SP - -

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

SN - 0959-8138

ER -