Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain. Comment on Cohen et al

  • Graham L. Moseley
  • , Neil Pearson
  • , Roland Reezigt
  • , Victoria J. Madden
  • , Mark R. Hutchinson
  • , Martin Dunbar
  • , Anneke J. Beetsma
  • , Hayley B. Leake
  • , Pete Moore
  • , Laura Simons
  • , Lauren Heathcote
  • , Cormac Ryan
  • , Carolyn Berryman
  • , Amelia K. Mardon
  • , Benedict M. Wand

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

We applaud many of the sentiments put forward by Cohen et al in their critique of language and logic in pain medicine.8 Pleas to avoid conflation between nociception and pain are not new - “The mislabelling of nociceptors as pain fibres was not an elegant simplification but a most unfortunate trivialisation of pain”29; “.. we don't actually have ‘pain receptors’, or ‘pain nerves’ or ‘pain pathways’ or ‘pain centres.’”4 We are among those who see such conflation as contrasting with contemporary understandings of ‘how pain works’ and undermining evidence-based treatment approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-181
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date20 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain. Comment on Cohen et al'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this