TY - JOUR
T1 - Content Analysis of Patient Safety Incident Reports for Older Adult Patient Transfers, Handovers, and Discharges
T2 - Do They Serve Organizations, Staff, or Patients?
AU - Scott, Jason
AU - Dawson, Pamela
AU - Heavey, Emily
AU - De Brún, Aoife
AU - Buttery, Andy
AU - Waring, Justin
AU - Flynn, Darren
PY - 2019/11/26
Y1 - 2019/11/26
N2 - Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze content of incident reports during patient transitions in the context of care of older people, cardiology, orthopedics, and stroke.
Methods: A structured search strategy identified incident reports involving patient transitions (March 2014–August 2014, January 2015–June 2015)
within 2 National Health Service Trusts (in upper and lower quartiles of incident reports/100 admissions) in care of older people, cardiology, orthopedics,
and stroke. Content analysis identified the following: incident classifications;
active failures; latent conditions; patient/relative involvement; and evidence
of individual or organizational learning. Reported harm was interpreted with
reference to National Reporting and Learning System criteria.
Results: A total 278 incident reports were analyzed. Fourteen incident classifications were identified, with pressure ulcers the modal category (n = 101,36%),
followed by falls (n = 32, 12%), medication (n = 31, 11%), and documentation (n = 29, 10%). Half (n = 139, 50%) of incident reports related to
interunit/department/team transfers. Latent conditions were explicit in 33
(12%) reports; most frequently, these related to inadequate resources/staff
and concomitant time pressures (n = 13). Patient/family involvement was
explicit in 61 (22%) reports. Patient well-being was explicit in 24 (9%) reports. Individual and organizational learning was evident in 3% and 7% of
reports, respectively. Reported harm was significantly lower than coderinterpreted harm (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Incident report quality was suboptimal for individual and organizational learning. Underreporting level of harm suggests reporter bias, which requires reducing as much as practicable. System-level interventions are warranted
to encourage use of staff reflective skills, emphasizing joint ownership of incidents. Co-producing incident reports with other clinicians involved in the transition and patients/relatives could optimize organizational learning
AB - Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze content of incident reports during patient transitions in the context of care of older people, cardiology, orthopedics, and stroke.
Methods: A structured search strategy identified incident reports involving patient transitions (March 2014–August 2014, January 2015–June 2015)
within 2 National Health Service Trusts (in upper and lower quartiles of incident reports/100 admissions) in care of older people, cardiology, orthopedics,
and stroke. Content analysis identified the following: incident classifications;
active failures; latent conditions; patient/relative involvement; and evidence
of individual or organizational learning. Reported harm was interpreted with
reference to National Reporting and Learning System criteria.
Results: A total 278 incident reports were analyzed. Fourteen incident classifications were identified, with pressure ulcers the modal category (n = 101,36%),
followed by falls (n = 32, 12%), medication (n = 31, 11%), and documentation (n = 29, 10%). Half (n = 139, 50%) of incident reports related to
interunit/department/team transfers. Latent conditions were explicit in 33
(12%) reports; most frequently, these related to inadequate resources/staff
and concomitant time pressures (n = 13). Patient/family involvement was
explicit in 61 (22%) reports. Patient well-being was explicit in 24 (9%) reports. Individual and organizational learning was evident in 3% and 7% of
reports, respectively. Reported harm was significantly lower than coderinterpreted harm (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Incident report quality was suboptimal for individual and organizational learning. Underreporting level of harm suggests reporter bias, which requires reducing as much as practicable. System-level interventions are warranted
to encourage use of staff reflective skills, emphasizing joint ownership of incidents. Co-producing incident reports with other clinicians involved in the transition and patients/relatives could optimize organizational learning
U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000654
DO - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000654
M3 - Article
SN - 1549-8417
JO - Journal of Patient Safety
JF - Journal of Patient Safety
ER -