Corpus-based intention recognition in cooperation dilemmas.

The Anh Han, Luís Moniz Pereira, Francisco C. Santos

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Intention recognition is ubiquitous in most social interactions among humans and other primates. Despite this, the role of intention recognition in the emergence of cooperative actions remains elusive. Resorting to the tools of evolutionary game theory, herein we describe a computational model showing how intention recognition coevolves with cooperation in populations of self-regarding individuals. By equipping some individuals with the capacity of assessing the intentions of others in the course of a prototypical dilemma of cooperation-the repeated prisoner's dilemma-we show how intention recognition is favored by natural selection, opening a window of opportunity for cooperation to thrive. We introduce a new strategy (IR) that is able to assign an intention to the actions of opponents, on the basis of an acquired corpus consisting of possible plans achieving that intention, as well as to then make decisions on the basis of such recognized intentions. The success of IR is grounded on the free exploitation of unconditional cooperators while remaining robust against unconditional defectors. In addition, we show how intention recognizers do indeed prevail against the best-known successful strategies of iterated dilemmas of cooperation, even in the presence of errors and reduction of fitness associated with a small cognitive cost for performing intention recognition.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)365-383
    Number of pages19
    JournalArtificial Life
    Volume18
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Corpus-based intention recognition in cooperation dilemmas.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Santos, F. C. (2012). Corpus-based intention recognition in cooperation dilemmas. Artificial Life, 18(4), 365-383.