Decentralized Dynamics for Finite Opinion Games

Diodato Ferraioli, Paul W. Goldberg, Carmine Ventre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

100 Downloads (Pure)


Game theory studies situations in which strategic players can modify the state of a given system, in the absence of a central authority. Solution concepts, such as Nash equilibrium, have been defined in order to predict the outcome of such situations. In multi-player settings, it has been pointed out that to be realistic, a solution concept should be obtainable via processes that are decentralized and reasonably simple. Accordingly we look at the computation of solution concepts by means of decentralized dynamics. These are algorithms in which players move in turns to decrease their own cost and the hope is that the system reaches an “equilibrium” quickly. We study these dynamics for the class of opinion games, recently introduced by Bindel et al. [10]. These are games, important in economics and sociology, that model the formation of an opinion in a social network. We study best-response dynamics and show upper and lower bounds on the convergence to Nash equilibria. We also study a noisy version of best-response dynamics, called logit dynamics, and prove a host of results about its convergence rate as the noise in the system varies. To get these results, we use a variety of techniques developed to bound the mixing time of Markov chains, including coupling, spectral characterizations and bottleneck ratio.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)-
JournalTheoretical Computer Science
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Decentralized Dynamics for Finite Opinion Games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this