Discursive deracialization in talk about asylum seeking

Simon Goodman, Shani Burke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


In this paper we explore the extent to which 'discursive deracialization', the removal of 'race' from potentially racially motivated arguments, is taking place in talk about asylum seeking. A discourse analysis is conducted on the part of a corpus of data collected from focus groups with undergraduate students talking about asylum seeking, in which they were asked if they considered it to be racist to oppose asylum. We show that speakers use three arguments for opposing asylum that are explicitly framed as non-racist: opposition is based on (1) economic reasons (2) religious grounds and the associated threat of terrorism and (3) the lack of asylum seekers' ability to integrate into British society. These findings are discussed with regard to the implications they have for our understanding of discursive deracialization in which it is shown that there is a common knowledge understanding, albeit one that needs qualifying, that opposition to asylum is not racist.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-123
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Discursive deracialization in talk about asylum seeking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this