TY - JOUR
T1 - Does a bout of strength training aVect 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance and rowing-speciWc maximal power 24 h later?
AU - Gee, Thomas I.
AU - French, Duncan N.
AU - Howatson, Glyn
AU - Payton, Stephen J.
AU - Berger, Nicolas
AU - Thompson, Kevin G.
PY - 2011/11/1
Y1 - 2011/11/1
N2 - Rowers regularly undertake rowing training within 24 h of performing bouts of strength training; however, the eVect of this practice has not been investigated. This study evaluated the impact of a bout of high-intensity strength training on 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance and rowing-speciWc maximal power. Eight highly trained male club rowers performed baseline measures of Wve separate, static squat jumps (SSJ) and countermovement jumps (CMJ), maximal rowing ergometer power strokes (PS) and a single 2,000 m rowing ergometer test (2,000 m). Subsequently, participants performed a highintensity strength training session consisting of various multi-joint barbell exercises. The 2,000 m test was repeated at 24 and 48 h post-ST, in addition SSJ, CMJ and PS tests were performed at these time points and also at 2 h post-ST. Muscle soreness, serum creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed pre-ST and 2, 24 and 48 h post-ST. Following the ST, there were signiWcant elevations in muscle soreness (2 and 24 h, P < 0.01), CK (2, 24 and 48 h, P < 0.01), and LDH (2 h, P < 0.05) in comparison to baseline values. There were signiWcant decrements across all time points for SSJ, CMJ and PS, which ranged between 3 and 10% (P < 0.05). However, 2,000 m performance and related measurements of heart rate and blood lactate were not signiWcantly aVected by ST. In summary, a bout of high-intensity strength training resulted in symptoms of muscle damage and decrements in rowing-speciWc maximal power, but this did not aVect 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance in highly trained rowers.
AB - Rowers regularly undertake rowing training within 24 h of performing bouts of strength training; however, the eVect of this practice has not been investigated. This study evaluated the impact of a bout of high-intensity strength training on 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance and rowing-speciWc maximal power. Eight highly trained male club rowers performed baseline measures of Wve separate, static squat jumps (SSJ) and countermovement jumps (CMJ), maximal rowing ergometer power strokes (PS) and a single 2,000 m rowing ergometer test (2,000 m). Subsequently, participants performed a highintensity strength training session consisting of various multi-joint barbell exercises. The 2,000 m test was repeated at 24 and 48 h post-ST, in addition SSJ, CMJ and PS tests were performed at these time points and also at 2 h post-ST. Muscle soreness, serum creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed pre-ST and 2, 24 and 48 h post-ST. Following the ST, there were signiWcant elevations in muscle soreness (2 and 24 h, P < 0.01), CK (2, 24 and 48 h, P < 0.01), and LDH (2 h, P < 0.05) in comparison to baseline values. There were signiWcant decrements across all time points for SSJ, CMJ and PS, which ranged between 3 and 10% (P < 0.05). However, 2,000 m performance and related measurements of heart rate and blood lactate were not signiWcantly aVected by ST. In summary, a bout of high-intensity strength training resulted in symptoms of muscle damage and decrements in rowing-speciWc maximal power, but this did not aVect 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance in highly trained rowers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855662853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00421-011-1878-3
DO - 10.1007/s00421-011-1878-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 21390543
AN - SCOPUS:84855662853
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 111
SP - 2653
EP - 2662
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 11
ER -