Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.

Kathryn Carruthers; Dorothy Hannis; Jonathan Robinson; Alan Armstrong

doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003

Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.

Kathryn Carruthers, Dorothy Hannis, Jonathan Robinson, Alan Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

125 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020-March 2021).

Method: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods.

Results: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant.

Conclusion: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Neonatal Nursing
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003
Publication status	Published - 15 Jun 2022

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003Licence: CC BY

Full textProof, 384 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{4c6246d204b64992afa7938f5a02abfb,

title = "Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.",

abstract = "Objective: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020-March 2021).Method: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods.Results: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant.Conclusion: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided.",

author = "Kathryn Carruthers and Dorothy Hannis and Jonathan Robinson and Alan Armstrong",

year = "2022",

month = jun,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Neonatal Nursing",

issn = "1355-1841",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.

AU - Carruthers, Kathryn

AU - Hannis, Dorothy

AU - Robinson, Jonathan

AU - Armstrong, Alan

PY - 2022/6/15

Y1 - 2022/6/15

N2 - Objective: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020-March 2021).Method: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods.Results: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant.Conclusion: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided.

AB - Objective: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020-March 2021).Method: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods.Results: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant.Conclusion: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 35722595

SN - 1355-1841

JO - Journal of Neonatal Nursing

JF - Journal of Neonatal Nursing

ER -

Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model.

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this