TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of education to facilitate knowledge about chronic pain for adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis
AU - Geneen, Louise J.
AU - Martin, Denis
AU - Adams, Nicola
AU - Clarke, Clare
AU - Dunbar, Martin
AU - Jones, Derek
AU - McNamee, Paul
AU - Schofield, Pat
AU - Smith, Blair H.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Background: Chronic pain can contribute to disability, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, poor quality of life
and increased health care costs, with close to 20 % of the adult population in Europe reporting chronic pain. To
empower the person to self-manage, it is advocated that education and training about the nature of pain and its
effects and how to live with pain is provided. The objective of this review is to determine the level of evidence for
education to facilitate knowledge about chronic pain, delivered as a stand-alone intervention for adults, to reduce
pain and disability.
Methods: We identified randomised controlled trials of educational intervention for chronic pain by searching
CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ongoing trials registries (inception to December 2013). Main inclusion criteria
were (1) pain >3 months; (2) study design that allowed isolation of effects of education and (3) measures of
pain or disability. Two reviewers independently screened and appraised each study.
Results: Nine studies were analysed. Pooled data from five studies, where the comparator group was usual care,
showed no improvement in pain or disability. In the other four studies, comparing different types of education, there
was no evidence for an improvement in pain; although, there was evidence (from one study) of a decrease in disability
with a particular form of education—pain neurophysiology education (PNE). Post-hoc analysis of psychosocial
outcomes reported in the studies showed evidence of a reduction in catastrophising and an increase of knowledge
about pain following PNE.
Conclusions: The evidence base is limited by the small numbers of studies, their relatively small sample sizes,
and the diversity in types of education studied. From that limited evidence, the only support for this type of
education is for PNE, though it is insufficiently strong to recommend conclusively that PNE should be delivered
as a stand-alone intervention.
It therefore remains sensible to recommend that education be delivered in conjunction with other pain
management approaches as we cannot confidently conclude that education alone is effective in reducing pain
intensity or related disability in chronic pain in adults.
AB - Background: Chronic pain can contribute to disability, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, poor quality of life
and increased health care costs, with close to 20 % of the adult population in Europe reporting chronic pain. To
empower the person to self-manage, it is advocated that education and training about the nature of pain and its
effects and how to live with pain is provided. The objective of this review is to determine the level of evidence for
education to facilitate knowledge about chronic pain, delivered as a stand-alone intervention for adults, to reduce
pain and disability.
Methods: We identified randomised controlled trials of educational intervention for chronic pain by searching
CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ongoing trials registries (inception to December 2013). Main inclusion criteria
were (1) pain >3 months; (2) study design that allowed isolation of effects of education and (3) measures of
pain or disability. Two reviewers independently screened and appraised each study.
Results: Nine studies were analysed. Pooled data from five studies, where the comparator group was usual care,
showed no improvement in pain or disability. In the other four studies, comparing different types of education, there
was no evidence for an improvement in pain; although, there was evidence (from one study) of a decrease in disability
with a particular form of education—pain neurophysiology education (PNE). Post-hoc analysis of psychosocial
outcomes reported in the studies showed evidence of a reduction in catastrophising and an increase of knowledge
about pain following PNE.
Conclusions: The evidence base is limited by the small numbers of studies, their relatively small sample sizes,
and the diversity in types of education studied. From that limited evidence, the only support for this type of
education is for PNE, though it is insufficiently strong to recommend conclusively that PNE should be delivered
as a stand-alone intervention.
It therefore remains sensible to recommend that education be delivered in conjunction with other pain
management approaches as we cannot confidently conclude that education alone is effective in reducing pain
intensity or related disability in chronic pain in adults.
U2 - 10.1186/s13643-015-0120-5
DO - 10.1186/s13643-015-0120-5
M3 - Article
SN - 2046-4053
VL - 4
SP - -
JO - Systematic Reviews
JF - Systematic Reviews
IS - 132
ER -