Estimation of daily dietary fluoride intake: 3-d food diary v. 2-d duplicate plate

Narges Omid, Anne Maguire, William O'Hare, Fatemeh Zohoori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

116 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The 3-d food diary method (3-d FD) or the 2-d duplicate plate (2-d DP) method have been used to measure dietary fluoride (F) intake by many studies. This study aimed to compare daily dietary F intake (DDFI) estimated by the 3-d FD and 2-d DP methods at group and individual levels. Dietary data for sixty-one healthy children aged 4–6 years were collected using 3-d FD and 2-d DP methods with a 1-week gap between each collection. Food diary data were analysed for F using the Weighed Intake Analysis Software Package, whereas duplicate diets were analysed by an acid diffusion method using an F ion-selective electrode. Paired t test and linear regression were used to compare dietary data at the group and individual levels, respectively. At the group level, mean DDFI was 0·025 (sd 0·016) and 0·028 (sd 0·013) mg/kg body weight (bw) per d estimated by 3-d FD and 2-d DP, respectively. No statistically significant difference (P =0·10) was observed in estimated DDFI by each method at the group level. At an individual level, the agreement in estimating F intake (mg/kg bw per d) using the 3-d FD method compared with the 2-d DP method was within ±0·011 (95 % CI 0·009, 0·013) mg/kg bw per d. At the group level, DDFI data obtained by either the 2-d DP method or the 3-d FD method can be replaced. At an individual level, the typical error and the narrow margin between optimal and excessive F intake suggested that the DDFI data obtained by one method cannot replace the dietary data estimated from the other method.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2103-2109
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume114
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Oct 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of daily dietary fluoride intake: 3-d food diary v. 2-d duplicate plate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this