Evidence-informed practice versus evidence-based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding, and behavior toward the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of UG student.

Kumah EA, R McSherry, J Bettany-Saltikov, P van Schaik, S Hamilton, J Hogg, V Whittaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To produce graduates with strong knowledge and skills in the application of evidence into healthcare practice, it is imperative that all undergraduate health and social care students are taught, in an efficient manner, the processes involved in applying evidence into practice. The two main concepts that are linked to the application of evidence into practice are “evidence-based practice” and “evidence-informed practice.” Globally, evidence-based practice is regarded as the gold standard for the provision of safe and effective healthcare. Despite the extensive awareness of evidence-based practice, healthcare practitioners continue to encounter difficulties in its implementation. This has generated an ongoing international debate as to whether evidence-based practice should be replaced with evidence-informed practice, and which of the two concepts better facilitate the effective and consistent application of evidence into healthcare practice.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1233
JournalCampbell Systematic Reviews
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-informed practice versus evidence-based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding, and behavior toward the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of UG student.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this