Exploring the evidence base for Tier 3 specialist weight management interventions for children aged 2-18 years in the UK: a rapid systematic review

Louisa Ells, Tamara Brown, Claire L. O'Malley, J Blackshaw, V Coulton, A. E. (Alison) Tedstone, C. D. (Carolyn) Summerbell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    61 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: The impact of specialist weight management services (Tier 3) for children with severe and complex obesity in the UK is unclear. This review aims to examine the impact of child Tier 3 services in the UK, exploring service characteristics and implications for practice. Methods: Rapid systematic review of any study examining specialist weight management interventions in any UK setting including children (2-18 years) with a body mass index >99.6th centile or >98th centile with comorbidity. Results: Twelve studies (5 RCTs and 7 uncontrolled) were included in a variety of settings. Study quality was moderate or low and mean baseline body mass index z-score ranged from 2.7 to 3.6 units. Study samples were small and children were predominantly older (10-14 years), female and white. Multidisciplinary team composition and eligibility criteria varied; dropout ranged from 5% to 43%. Improvements in zBMIover 1-24 months ranged from -0.13 to -0.41 units. Conclusions: Specialist weight management interventions for children with severe obesity demonstrated a reduction in zBMI, across a variety of UK settings. Studies were heterogeneous in content and thus conclusions on service design cannot be drawn. There is a paucity of evidence for Tier 3 services for children, and further research is required
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)835–847
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Public Health
    Volume40
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Dec 2017

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the evidence base for Tier 3 specialist weight management interventions for children aged 2-18 years in the UK: a rapid systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this