Fair and safe eligibility criteria for women's sport

Ross Tucker, Emma N. Hilton, Kerry McGawley, Noel Pollock, Grégoire P. Millet, Øyvind Sandbakk, Glyn Howatson, Gregory A. Brown, Lara A. Carlson, Mark Chen, Neil Heron, Christopher Kirk, Marie H. Murphy, Jamie Pringle, Andrew Richardson, Jordan Santos-Concejero, Ask Vest Christiansen, Carwyn Jones , Juan-Manuel Alonso, Rebecca RobinsonNigel Jones, Mathew Wilson, Michael G. Parker, Arabah Chintoh, Sandra Hunter, Jonathon W. Senefeld, Mary I. O'Connor, Michael Joyner, Eva M. Carneiro, Cathy Devine, Jon Pike, Tommy Lundberg

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Abstract

The Paris 2024 Olympic boxing competition, featuring athletes with alleged male advantages in the female category, has reinvigorated controversy about eligibility criteria for women's sport. Recently, in this journal [1], we explained how endoge-nous testosterone production during male development leads to performance advantages arising from well-established sex-based differences in body size, muscle mass, endurance, speed, strength, and power. These physical advantages are so large that they necessitate a separate and protected female category that excludes male advantage to ensure fair and safe competition for female athletes. The unfortunate developments in the 2024Olympic Games compel these matters to be revisited.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14715
Pages (from-to)1-2
Number of pages2
JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fair and safe eligibility criteria for women's sport'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this