Abstract
The teaching of biological evidence as part of the practical component of forensic science degree
courses is a vital part of preparing the next generation of forensic scientists. Within the UK and Europe, this teaching is recognised by the UK Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences (CSoFS) within their Educational Quality Standards (EQS). Universities are required to provide opportunities for students to become competent in those methods used to locate and recover common biological trace evidence types.
Despite the integral nature of practical skills development within any forensic science programme, how the testing of biological samples is taught varies across the UK Higher Education (HE) sector. Although institutions teach the same basic processes for blood, semen, saliva and hair, the materials used to teach these varies with some institutions using human samples, some animal and some synthetic.
This research explores the range of current practices employed at HE institutions within the UK while considering the reasons institutions may prefer not to use human samples and thus seek a suitable substitute. Additionally, the differences in student experience for those programmes recognised or accredited by the CSoFS is noted. It is highlighted that the forensic learning and teaching community within the UK would benefit from greater discussion around standardising HE forensic biology provision.
courses is a vital part of preparing the next generation of forensic scientists. Within the UK and Europe, this teaching is recognised by the UK Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences (CSoFS) within their Educational Quality Standards (EQS). Universities are required to provide opportunities for students to become competent in those methods used to locate and recover common biological trace evidence types.
Despite the integral nature of practical skills development within any forensic science programme, how the testing of biological samples is taught varies across the UK Higher Education (HE) sector. Although institutions teach the same basic processes for blood, semen, saliva and hair, the materials used to teach these varies with some institutions using human samples, some animal and some synthetic.
This research explores the range of current practices employed at HE institutions within the UK while considering the reasons institutions may prefer not to use human samples and thus seek a suitable substitute. Additionally, the differences in student experience for those programmes recognised or accredited by the CSoFS is noted. It is highlighted that the forensic learning and teaching community within the UK would benefit from greater discussion around standardising HE forensic biology provision.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Forensic Science Education |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Dec 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forensic biological laboratory teaching practices in the UK Higher Education sector: human, animal or something else?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver