Abstract
Recent years have seen increasing concern in relation to intellectual property crime and as a result, pressure has mounted to tackle the ‘problem’ of counterfeiting. However, despite an increasing recognition of the responsibility of public policing agencies, a strong consumer-responsibility approach has emerged. This relies on the assumption that if consumers are ‘educated’ about the ‘dangers of buying fakes’ they will refrain from doing so – resulting in a reduced demand and thus, a reduced supply. This article, which is based upon a mixed-methods empirical study investigating people’s attitudes to, and consumption of, counterfeit fashion goods, seeks to problematize the responsibility being placed upon consumers and argues that fundamentally, this is a flawed approach for anti-counterfeiting policy. This article argues that not only does this approach fail to understand consumer attitudes, but it fails to understand the nature and consumption of fashion more generally.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 0 |
| Pages (from-to) | 169-185 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Criminology and Criminal Justice |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Jun 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Get real, don't buy fakes': Fashion fakes and flawed policy - the problem with taking a consumer-responsibility approach to reducing the 'problem' of counterfeiting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver