Abstract
This article postulates that the House of Lords took a wrong turn in Adomako, missing the opportunity to revise the Caldwell/Lawrence guidance on recklessness, to produce a more appropriate determinant of criminal liability for inadvertent conduct causing death. It will be advocated that gross negligence manslaughter is replaced with reckless manslaughter utilising an objective capacity–based test. A proposal that encompasses both acts and omissions will be advanced which is theoretically underpinned by a hybrid theory of culpability. It will be contended that this hybrid theory best represents current approaches to criminally reckless conduct in practice and produces a morally apposite method of ascertaining criminal responsibility where the risk of death was not foreseen.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 0 |
Pages (from-to) | 228-245 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | The Journal of Criminal Law |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2020 |