Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy

Alessandro Soranzo, Tiziano Agostini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the 'ratio-invariant' property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same.
In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumination edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illumination
frame. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1359-1368
JournalPerception
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Lighting
Luminance
Cathode ray tubes
Experiments

Bibliographical note

Subject to restrictions, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing).

Cite this

Soranzo, A., & Agostini, T. (2004). Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy. Perception, 33(11), 1359-1368. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5282
Soranzo, Alessandro ; Agostini, Tiziano. / Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy. In: Perception. 2004 ; Vol. 33, No. 11. pp. 1359-1368.
@article{945b2334d8574290b8b09cb12c49716e,
title = "Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy",
abstract = "The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the 'ratio-invariant' property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same.In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumination edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illuminationframe. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.",
author = "Alessandro Soranzo and Tiziano Agostini",
note = "Subject to restrictions, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing).",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/p5282",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1359--1368",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

Soranzo, A & Agostini, T 2004, 'Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy', Perception, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1359-1368. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5282

Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy. / Soranzo, Alessandro; Agostini, Tiziano.

In: Perception, Vol. 33, No. 11, 01.11.2004, p. 1359-1368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy

AU - Soranzo, Alessandro

AU - Agostini, Tiziano

N1 - Subject to restrictions, author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing).

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the 'ratio-invariant' property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same.In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumination edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illuminationframe. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.

AB - The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the 'ratio-invariant' property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same.In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumination edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illuminationframe. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.

U2 - 10.1068/p5282

DO - 10.1068/p5282

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1359

EP - 1368

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 11

ER -

Soranzo A, Agostini T. Impossible Shadows and Lightness Constancy. Perception. 2004 Nov 1;33(11):1359-1368. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5282