Abstract
Over the past few years, concerns have been raised as to the role of the Home Secretary in tariff fixing and extending for life-sentence prisoners. The Home Secretary's powers have now been taken away in all circumstances save for that of the sane adult murderer. 1 The aim of this Comment is therefore to discuss whether murder really is 'most foul', both with regard to the Home Secretary's tariff-fixing powers and the special status of the offence of murder itself in its attraction of a mandatory life sentence, taking into account the recent House of Lords' decisions in Ex p. Anderson' and R v Lichniak; R v Pyrah
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 130-138 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | The Journal of Criminal Law |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is Murder ‘Most Foul’? R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex P. Anderson R v Lichniak; R v Pyrah'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver