Abstract
Stakeholder engagement (SE), particularly with representatives of locally affected communities, is integral to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) processes, so critical evaluation of SE is necessary across a range of different socio-political contexts. EIA SE practice in the Sultanate of Oman is examined using Q-Methodology, a qualitative-quantitative discourse analysis technique, in order to evaluate key-actor perspectives and policy directions. Four discourses emerge, pertaining to (1) the institutionalisation of SE; (2) business as usual; (3) rights-centred engagement; and (4) decentralisation of EIA institutions. Consensus emerges that shows support for transparency and formalisation of SE; greater citizen-centred decision-making power; transparency in government guidelines; and the elimination of developer-led consultation processes. Policy options for reforming EIA policy are discussed, including a code of participation practice and a toolkit of suitable engagement methods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-112 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Planning and Management |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Key actor perspectives on stakeholder engagement in Omani Environmental Impact Assessment: an application of Q-Methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver