Left/right limb judgement task performance following total knee replacement

Crystal A. Rosser, T. D Punt, Cormac Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Working body schema (WBS) of the limbs may be indirectly assessed using left/right limb judgement (LRLJ) task performance. This study aimed to investigate if: 1) Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients perform LRLJ tasks with reference to their WBS; 2) patients have a disrupted WBS following a TKR for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee; and 3) lower limb-based LRLJ task performance changes following post-surgical rehabilitation using change in upper limb-based LRLJ task performance as a control. Methods: In a convenience sample (n=18, age 69±7yrs, 12F 6M) of TKR patients <1month post-surgery, WBS was assessed using LRLJ task performance for the upper (pictures of the hand) and lower limb (pictures of the foot) before and after rehabilitation. Accuracy and response time (RT) were analysed using a series of 2x2x2 ANOVAs. Results: LRLJ task performance for images corresponding with the operated and non-operated side were comparable for accuracy (p=0.83) and RT (p=0.28). Accuracy for hand images was comparable from baseline to post-rehabilitation (p=0.54) whereas accuracy for feet images increased significantly (p=0.03). Responses for awkward posture images were significantly slower than for more natural posture images (p=0.001). Conclusions: LRLJ task performance data reflected the typical biomechanical constraints indicative of implicit motor imagery being performed by patients. There was no evidence of a disrupted LRLJ task performance for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee. Following post-surgical rehabilitation, patients’ lower limb LRLJ task performance improved whilst upper limb LRLJ task performance remained unchanged. These findings are the first to show that WBS improves with rehabilitation following TKR, and this may explain some of the clinical improvements observed. Undertaking LRLJ tasks could theoretically be a useful adjunct to current post-TKR rehabilitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-84
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date20 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Task Performance and Analysis
Extremities
Body Image
Rehabilitation
Knee
Lower Extremity
Posture
Upper Extremity
Reaction Time
Foot
Hand
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Analysis of Variance

Cite this

@article{ed9424ac311645158681f3355550b99c,
title = "Left/right limb judgement task performance following total knee replacement",
abstract = "Purpose: Working body schema (WBS) of the limbs may be indirectly assessed using left/right limb judgement (LRLJ) task performance. This study aimed to investigate if: 1) Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients perform LRLJ tasks with reference to their WBS; 2) patients have a disrupted WBS following a TKR for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee; and 3) lower limb-based LRLJ task performance changes following post-surgical rehabilitation using change in upper limb-based LRLJ task performance as a control. Methods: In a convenience sample (n=18, age 69±7yrs, 12F 6M) of TKR patients <1month post-surgery, WBS was assessed using LRLJ task performance for the upper (pictures of the hand) and lower limb (pictures of the foot) before and after rehabilitation. Accuracy and response time (RT) were analysed using a series of 2x2x2 ANOVAs. Results: LRLJ task performance for images corresponding with the operated and non-operated side were comparable for accuracy (p=0.83) and RT (p=0.28). Accuracy for hand images was comparable from baseline to post-rehabilitation (p=0.54) whereas accuracy for feet images increased significantly (p=0.03). Responses for awkward posture images were significantly slower than for more natural posture images (p=0.001). Conclusions: LRLJ task performance data reflected the typical biomechanical constraints indicative of implicit motor imagery being performed by patients. There was no evidence of a disrupted LRLJ task performance for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee. Following post-surgical rehabilitation, patients’ lower limb LRLJ task performance improved whilst upper limb LRLJ task performance remained unchanged. These findings are the first to show that WBS improves with rehabilitation following TKR, and this may explain some of the clinical improvements observed. Undertaking LRLJ tasks could theoretically be a useful adjunct to current post-TKR rehabilitation.",
author = "Rosser, {Crystal A.} and Punt, {T. D} and Cormac Ryan",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.3233/BMR-171104",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "77--84",
journal = "Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8127",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

Left/right limb judgement task performance following total knee replacement. / Rosser, Crystal A. ; Punt, T. D; Ryan, Cormac.

In: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Vol. 32, No. 1, 24.01.2019, p. 77-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left/right limb judgement task performance following total knee replacement

AU - Rosser, Crystal A.

AU - Punt, T. D

AU - Ryan, Cormac

PY - 2019/1/24

Y1 - 2019/1/24

N2 - Purpose: Working body schema (WBS) of the limbs may be indirectly assessed using left/right limb judgement (LRLJ) task performance. This study aimed to investigate if: 1) Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients perform LRLJ tasks with reference to their WBS; 2) patients have a disrupted WBS following a TKR for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee; and 3) lower limb-based LRLJ task performance changes following post-surgical rehabilitation using change in upper limb-based LRLJ task performance as a control. Methods: In a convenience sample (n=18, age 69±7yrs, 12F 6M) of TKR patients <1month post-surgery, WBS was assessed using LRLJ task performance for the upper (pictures of the hand) and lower limb (pictures of the foot) before and after rehabilitation. Accuracy and response time (RT) were analysed using a series of 2x2x2 ANOVAs. Results: LRLJ task performance for images corresponding with the operated and non-operated side were comparable for accuracy (p=0.83) and RT (p=0.28). Accuracy for hand images was comparable from baseline to post-rehabilitation (p=0.54) whereas accuracy for feet images increased significantly (p=0.03). Responses for awkward posture images were significantly slower than for more natural posture images (p=0.001). Conclusions: LRLJ task performance data reflected the typical biomechanical constraints indicative of implicit motor imagery being performed by patients. There was no evidence of a disrupted LRLJ task performance for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee. Following post-surgical rehabilitation, patients’ lower limb LRLJ task performance improved whilst upper limb LRLJ task performance remained unchanged. These findings are the first to show that WBS improves with rehabilitation following TKR, and this may explain some of the clinical improvements observed. Undertaking LRLJ tasks could theoretically be a useful adjunct to current post-TKR rehabilitation.

AB - Purpose: Working body schema (WBS) of the limbs may be indirectly assessed using left/right limb judgement (LRLJ) task performance. This study aimed to investigate if: 1) Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients perform LRLJ tasks with reference to their WBS; 2) patients have a disrupted WBS following a TKR for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee; and 3) lower limb-based LRLJ task performance changes following post-surgical rehabilitation using change in upper limb-based LRLJ task performance as a control. Methods: In a convenience sample (n=18, age 69±7yrs, 12F 6M) of TKR patients <1month post-surgery, WBS was assessed using LRLJ task performance for the upper (pictures of the hand) and lower limb (pictures of the foot) before and after rehabilitation. Accuracy and response time (RT) were analysed using a series of 2x2x2 ANOVAs. Results: LRLJ task performance for images corresponding with the operated and non-operated side were comparable for accuracy (p=0.83) and RT (p=0.28). Accuracy for hand images was comparable from baseline to post-rehabilitation (p=0.54) whereas accuracy for feet images increased significantly (p=0.03). Responses for awkward posture images were significantly slower than for more natural posture images (p=0.001). Conclusions: LRLJ task performance data reflected the typical biomechanical constraints indicative of implicit motor imagery being performed by patients. There was no evidence of a disrupted LRLJ task performance for the replaced knee compared to the contralateral knee. Following post-surgical rehabilitation, patients’ lower limb LRLJ task performance improved whilst upper limb LRLJ task performance remained unchanged. These findings are the first to show that WBS improves with rehabilitation following TKR, and this may explain some of the clinical improvements observed. Undertaking LRLJ tasks could theoretically be a useful adjunct to current post-TKR rehabilitation.

U2 - 10.3233/BMR-171104

DO - 10.3233/BMR-171104

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 77

EP - 84

JO - Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-8127

IS - 1

ER -