TY - JOUR
T1 - Mind The “Gap”: A Comparison of the Weekly Training Loads of English Premier League Academy Soccer Players in Under 23, Under 18 and Under 16 Age-Groups.
AU - Taylor, Jonathan
AU - Madden, Jonathan
AU - Hunter, Frances
AU - Thorne, Ben
AU - McLaren, Shaun
PY - 2022/2/25
Y1 - 2022/2/25
N2 - Purpose: The transition into full-time training represents a key period in the development of young soccer players. Here we compared the weekly training loads (matches, field-, and resistance-training) of English Premier-League Academy soccer players from under-16 (U16), under-18 (U18) and under-23 (U23) age-groups during a training meso-cycle. Methods: Forty players (U16 n= 13, U18 n= 15 and U23 n = 12) were monitored using global navigation satellite systems and differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE). External load metrics were total distance, high-speed running distance, (absolute: ≥19.8km·h-1, relative: ≥87% of 30-15 final-velocity [vIFT]), sprint distance (absolute: ≥25.2km·h-1, relative: ≥80% maximal sprint speed), and dynamic stress load. Internal load metrics were dRPE training loads. Results: Other than relative sprint distance, overall weekly external training loads were substantially greater for U18 and U23s when compared with U16s (effect size range: 1.09–1.99 [moderate to large]; ±90% confidence limits ~0.45). When compared with U16s, overall internal loads were substantially greater for U18s (0.69–0.95 [moderate]; ±~0.40), but not U23s. Differences in weekly training loads between U18s and U23s were inconclusive. Conclusions: Substantial differences in training loads between elite U16 players and their older counterparts, indicates the need for planned increases in training loads in anticipation of the transition into full-time training.
AB - Purpose: The transition into full-time training represents a key period in the development of young soccer players. Here we compared the weekly training loads (matches, field-, and resistance-training) of English Premier-League Academy soccer players from under-16 (U16), under-18 (U18) and under-23 (U23) age-groups during a training meso-cycle. Methods: Forty players (U16 n= 13, U18 n= 15 and U23 n = 12) were monitored using global navigation satellite systems and differential ratings of perceived exertion (dRPE). External load metrics were total distance, high-speed running distance, (absolute: ≥19.8km·h-1, relative: ≥87% of 30-15 final-velocity [vIFT]), sprint distance (absolute: ≥25.2km·h-1, relative: ≥80% maximal sprint speed), and dynamic stress load. Internal load metrics were dRPE training loads. Results: Other than relative sprint distance, overall weekly external training loads were substantially greater for U18 and U23s when compared with U16s (effect size range: 1.09–1.99 [moderate to large]; ±90% confidence limits ~0.45). When compared with U16s, overall internal loads were substantially greater for U18s (0.69–0.95 [moderate]; ±~0.40), but not U23s. Differences in weekly training loads between U18s and U23s were inconclusive. Conclusions: Substantial differences in training loads between elite U16 players and their older counterparts, indicates the need for planned increases in training loads in anticipation of the transition into full-time training.
U2 - 10.1007/s42978-022-00162-4
DO - 10.1007/s42978-022-00162-4
M3 - Article
VL - 5
SP - 34
EP - 43
JO - Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
JF - Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise
ER -