Mobilising knowledge in public health: reflections on ten years of collaborative working in Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health

Peter Van Der Graaf, Mandy Cheetham, Amelia Lake, Mark Welford, Rosemary Rushmer, Janet Shucksmith, Avri Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Fuse was established in 2008 as one of five public health research centres of excellence in the UK funded by the UK Clinical Research Centres collaboration. The centre works across five universities in the North East of England. This is an innovative collaboration and enables the pooling of research expertise. A prime focus of the centre is not just the production of excellent research, but also its translation into usable evidence, a dual focus that remains uncommon.

Aims/objectives
This practice paper outlines Fuse’s approach to knowledge exchange (KE) by reflecting on ten years of collaborative research between academics and policy and practice partners in the North East of England. We will describe the principles and assumption underlying our approach and outline a conceptual model of four steps in Fuse’s KE process to develop collaborative research and achieve meaningful impact on policy and practice.

Key conclusions
Our model describes a fluid and dynamic approach to knowledge exchange broken down in four steps in the KE process that are concurrent, iterative and vary in intensity over time: awareness raising; knowledge sharing; making evidence fit for purpose; and supporting uptake and implementation of evidence. These steps support the relational context of KE. Relationship building and maintenance is essential for all stages of KE to develop trust and explore the meaning and usefulness of evidence in a multi-directional information flow that supports the co-creating and application of evidence.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEvidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
Early online date23 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

public health
evidence
knowledge
information flow
expertise
university

Bibliographical note

Manuscript was accepted by journal on 7 June 2019.

Cite this

@article{c325f86addc541398473f9dae19cc361,
title = "Mobilising knowledge in public health: reflections on ten years of collaborative working in Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health",
abstract = "Background Fuse was established in 2008 as one of five public health research centres of excellence in the UK funded by the UK Clinical Research Centres collaboration. The centre works across five universities in the North East of England. This is an innovative collaboration and enables the pooling of research expertise. A prime focus of the centre is not just the production of excellent research, but also its translation into usable evidence, a dual focus that remains uncommon.Aims/objectives This practice paper outlines Fuse’s approach to knowledge exchange (KE) by reflecting on ten years of collaborative research between academics and policy and practice partners in the North East of England. We will describe the principles and assumption underlying our approach and outline a conceptual model of four steps in Fuse’s KE process to develop collaborative research and achieve meaningful impact on policy and practice.Key conclusions Our model describes a fluid and dynamic approach to knowledge exchange broken down in four steps in the KE process that are concurrent, iterative and vary in intensity over time: awareness raising; knowledge sharing; making evidence fit for purpose; and supporting uptake and implementation of evidence. These steps support the relational context of KE. Relationship building and maintenance is essential for all stages of KE to develop trust and explore the meaning and usefulness of evidence in a multi-directional information flow that supports the co-creating and application of evidence.",
author = "{Van Der Graaf}, Peter and Mandy Cheetham and Amelia Lake and Mark Welford and Rosemary Rushmer and Janet Shucksmith and Avri Rhodes",
note = "Manuscript was accepted by journal on 7 June 2019.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1332/204080519X15619879036817",
language = "English",
journal = "Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice",
issn = "1744-2656",
publisher = "Policy Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobilising knowledge in public health: reflections on ten years of collaborative working in Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health

AU - Van Der Graaf, Peter

AU - Cheetham, Mandy

AU - Lake, Amelia

AU - Welford, Mark

AU - Rushmer, Rosemary

AU - Shucksmith, Janet

AU - Rhodes, Avri

N1 - Manuscript was accepted by journal on 7 June 2019.

PY - 2019/7/24

Y1 - 2019/7/24

N2 - Background Fuse was established in 2008 as one of five public health research centres of excellence in the UK funded by the UK Clinical Research Centres collaboration. The centre works across five universities in the North East of England. This is an innovative collaboration and enables the pooling of research expertise. A prime focus of the centre is not just the production of excellent research, but also its translation into usable evidence, a dual focus that remains uncommon.Aims/objectives This practice paper outlines Fuse’s approach to knowledge exchange (KE) by reflecting on ten years of collaborative research between academics and policy and practice partners in the North East of England. We will describe the principles and assumption underlying our approach and outline a conceptual model of four steps in Fuse’s KE process to develop collaborative research and achieve meaningful impact on policy and practice.Key conclusions Our model describes a fluid and dynamic approach to knowledge exchange broken down in four steps in the KE process that are concurrent, iterative and vary in intensity over time: awareness raising; knowledge sharing; making evidence fit for purpose; and supporting uptake and implementation of evidence. These steps support the relational context of KE. Relationship building and maintenance is essential for all stages of KE to develop trust and explore the meaning and usefulness of evidence in a multi-directional information flow that supports the co-creating and application of evidence.

AB - Background Fuse was established in 2008 as one of five public health research centres of excellence in the UK funded by the UK Clinical Research Centres collaboration. The centre works across five universities in the North East of England. This is an innovative collaboration and enables the pooling of research expertise. A prime focus of the centre is not just the production of excellent research, but also its translation into usable evidence, a dual focus that remains uncommon.Aims/objectives This practice paper outlines Fuse’s approach to knowledge exchange (KE) by reflecting on ten years of collaborative research between academics and policy and practice partners in the North East of England. We will describe the principles and assumption underlying our approach and outline a conceptual model of four steps in Fuse’s KE process to develop collaborative research and achieve meaningful impact on policy and practice.Key conclusions Our model describes a fluid and dynamic approach to knowledge exchange broken down in four steps in the KE process that are concurrent, iterative and vary in intensity over time: awareness raising; knowledge sharing; making evidence fit for purpose; and supporting uptake and implementation of evidence. These steps support the relational context of KE. Relationship building and maintenance is essential for all stages of KE to develop trust and explore the meaning and usefulness of evidence in a multi-directional information flow that supports the co-creating and application of evidence.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/mobilising-knowledge-public-health-reflections-ten-years-collaborative-working-fuse-centre-translati

U2 - 10.1332/204080519X15619879036817

DO - 10.1332/204080519X15619879036817

M3 - Article

JO - Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice

JF - Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice

SN - 1744-2656

ER -