Modelling and comparison of calcium looping and chemical solvent scrubbing retrofits for CO₂ capture from coal-fired power plant

Keyphrases

• Amine Scrubbing 14%
• Ammonia Scrubbing 14%
• Calcination Reaction 14%
• Calcium Looping 100%
• Calcium-based Sorbent 14%
• Carbon Capture 42%
• Carbonation 14%
• Chemical Absorption 14%
• Chemical Solvent 100%
• Chilled Ammonia 14%
• CO2 Capture 100%
• CO2 Capture Technology 28%
• CO2 Emission Reduction 14%
• CO2 Emissions 14%
• Coal-fired Power Plant 100%
• Effective Means 14%
• Efficiency Penalty 42%
• Electricity Demand 14%
• Energy Requirement 14%
• High Temperature 14%
• High-fidelity Model 14%
• Low Efficiency 14%
• Net Power Output 14%
• Plant Operator 14%
• Plant Retrofit 14%
• Power Output 14%
• Power Plant 14%
• Power Plant Efficiency 14%
• Power Sector 14%
• Process Analysis 14%
• Retrofit Scenarios 42%
• Secondary Steam 14%
• Solvent Cleaning 100%
• Solvent Regeneration 14%
• Steam Cycle 14%
• Storage Technologies 14%
• Substantial Reduction 14%
• Supercritical Coal-fired Power Plant 14%
• System Capacity 14%
• Triethanolamine 14%

Engineering

• Calcium Based Sorbent 20%
• Calcium Looping Process 60%
• Carbon Capture 20%
• Carbon Capture and Storage Technology 20%
• Carbon Dioxide Capture 100%
• Carbonation 20%
• Chemical Absorption 20%
• Effective Mean 20%
• Electric Power Plant 40%
• Electricity Demand 20%
• Energy Requirement 20%
• Fired Power Plant 100%
• Model Fidelity 20%
• Net Power Output 20%
• Plant Operator 20%
• Power Output 20%
• Power Sector 20%
• Retrofit 100%
• System Capacity 20%
• Washing 20%

Chemical Engineering

• Calcination 33%
• Carbon Dioxide 66%
• Carbon Dioxide Capture 100%
• Ethanolamine 33%