Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda

The Anh Han, Lúis Moniz Pereira, Tom Lenaerts

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A race for technological supremacy in AI could lead to serious negative consequences, especially whenever ethical and safety procedures are underestimated or even ignored, leading potentially to the rejection of AI in general. For all to enjoy the benefits provided by safe, ethical and trustworthy AI systems, it is crucial to incentivise participants with appropriate strategies that ensure mutually beneficial normative behaviour and safety-compliance from all parties involved.
Little attention has been given to understanding the dynamics and emergent behaviours arising from this AI bidding war, and moreover, how to influence it to achieve certain desirable outcomes (e.g. AI for public good and participant compliance).
To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a research agenda to develop theoretical models that capture key factors of the AI race, revealing which strategic behaviours may emerge and hypothetical scenarios therein. Strategies from incentive and agreement modelling are directly applicable to systematically analyse how different types of incentives (namely, positive vs. negative, peer vs. institutional, and their combinations) influence safety-compliant behaviours over time, and how such behaviours should be configured to ensure desired global outcomes, studying at the same time how these mechanisms influence AI development. This agenda will provide actionable policies, showing how they need to be employed and deployed in order to achieve compliance and thereby avoid disasters as well as loosing confidence and trust in AI in general.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages10
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 27 Jan 2019
EventAAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019 - Hawaii, United States
Duration: 27 Jan 201928 Jan 2019
http://www.aies-conference.com/

Conference

ConferenceAAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019
CountryUnited States
CityHawaii
Period27/01/1928/01/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

Modeling
Research agenda
Bidding
Safety
Incentives
Disaster
Strategic behavior
Factors
Peers
Scenarios
Confidence
Agenda

Cite this

Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Lenaerts, T. (Accepted/In press). Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda. Paper presented at AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019, Hawaii, United States.
Han, The Anh ; Pereira, Lúis Moniz ; Lenaerts, Tom. / Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda. Paper presented at AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019, Hawaii, United States.10 p.
@conference{dff739cf09fa482a9668eec7bdcdb3b1,
title = "Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda",
abstract = "A race for technological supremacy in AI could lead to serious negative consequences, especially whenever ethical and safety procedures are underestimated or even ignored, leading potentially to the rejection of AI in general. For all to enjoy the benefits provided by safe, ethical and trustworthy AI systems, it is crucial to incentivise participants with appropriate strategies that ensure mutually beneficial normative behaviour and safety-compliance from all parties involved. Little attention has been given to understanding the dynamics and emergent behaviours arising from this AI bidding war, and moreover, how to influence it to achieve certain desirable outcomes (e.g. AI for public good and participant compliance). To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a research agenda to develop theoretical models that capture key factors of the AI race, revealing which strategic behaviours may emerge and hypothetical scenarios therein. Strategies from incentive and agreement modelling are directly applicable to systematically analyse how different types of incentives (namely, positive vs. negative, peer vs. institutional, and their combinations) influence safety-compliant behaviours over time, and how such behaviours should be configured to ensure desired global outcomes, studying at the same time how these mechanisms influence AI development. This agenda will provide actionable policies, showing how they need to be employed and deployed in order to achieve compliance and thereby avoid disasters as well as loosing confidence and trust in AI in general.",
author = "Han, {The Anh} and Pereira, {L{\'u}is Moniz} and Tom Lenaerts",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "27",
language = "English",
note = "AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019 ; Conference date: 27-01-2019 Through 28-01-2019",
url = "http://www.aies-conference.com/",

}

Han, TA, Pereira, LM & Lenaerts, T 2019, 'Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda' Paper presented at AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019, Hawaii, United States, 27/01/19 - 28/01/19, .

Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda. / Han, The Anh; Pereira, Lúis Moniz; Lenaerts, Tom.

2019. Paper presented at AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019, Hawaii, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda

AU - Han, The Anh

AU - Pereira, Lúis Moniz

AU - Lenaerts, Tom

PY - 2019/1/27

Y1 - 2019/1/27

N2 - A race for technological supremacy in AI could lead to serious negative consequences, especially whenever ethical and safety procedures are underestimated or even ignored, leading potentially to the rejection of AI in general. For all to enjoy the benefits provided by safe, ethical and trustworthy AI systems, it is crucial to incentivise participants with appropriate strategies that ensure mutually beneficial normative behaviour and safety-compliance from all parties involved. Little attention has been given to understanding the dynamics and emergent behaviours arising from this AI bidding war, and moreover, how to influence it to achieve certain desirable outcomes (e.g. AI for public good and participant compliance). To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a research agenda to develop theoretical models that capture key factors of the AI race, revealing which strategic behaviours may emerge and hypothetical scenarios therein. Strategies from incentive and agreement modelling are directly applicable to systematically analyse how different types of incentives (namely, positive vs. negative, peer vs. institutional, and their combinations) influence safety-compliant behaviours over time, and how such behaviours should be configured to ensure desired global outcomes, studying at the same time how these mechanisms influence AI development. This agenda will provide actionable policies, showing how they need to be employed and deployed in order to achieve compliance and thereby avoid disasters as well as loosing confidence and trust in AI in general.

AB - A race for technological supremacy in AI could lead to serious negative consequences, especially whenever ethical and safety procedures are underestimated or even ignored, leading potentially to the rejection of AI in general. For all to enjoy the benefits provided by safe, ethical and trustworthy AI systems, it is crucial to incentivise participants with appropriate strategies that ensure mutually beneficial normative behaviour and safety-compliance from all parties involved. Little attention has been given to understanding the dynamics and emergent behaviours arising from this AI bidding war, and moreover, how to influence it to achieve certain desirable outcomes (e.g. AI for public good and participant compliance). To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a research agenda to develop theoretical models that capture key factors of the AI race, revealing which strategic behaviours may emerge and hypothetical scenarios therein. Strategies from incentive and agreement modelling are directly applicable to systematically analyse how different types of incentives (namely, positive vs. negative, peer vs. institutional, and their combinations) influence safety-compliant behaviours over time, and how such behaviours should be configured to ensure desired global outcomes, studying at the same time how these mechanisms influence AI development. This agenda will provide actionable policies, showing how they need to be employed and deployed in order to achieve compliance and thereby avoid disasters as well as loosing confidence and trust in AI in general.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Han TA, Pereira LM, Lenaerts T. Modelling and Influencing the AI Bidding War: A Research Agenda. 2019. Paper presented at AAAI/ACM conference on AI, Ethics and Society 2019, Hawaii, United States.