Motor imagery during action observation enhances automatic imitation in children with and without developmental coordination disorder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by uncoordinated movement relative to age. While action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) can both independently enhance movement skills in children, we report the first study to assess the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) on automatic imitation in children aged 7–12 years both with DCD (n = 12) and without DCD (n = 12). On each trial, participants planned to execute an instructed rhythmical action (face washing or paint brushing). Before responding, participants observed a rhythmical distractor showing the same or a different action with a subtle speed manipulation across trials (fast vs. slow). Automatic imitation was quantified as an imitation bias in subsequent response cycle times. Across blocks of trials, participants engaged in AO, MI, or combined AO + MI during the distractor phase or intentionally imitated the distractor speeds. Although there were no between groups differences, combined AO + MI instructions produced a significantly greater imitation bias (115%) than both AO (109%) and MI (109%), with intentional imitation yielding the strongest effects overall (128%). Within groups analyses revealed a significant bias for AO and MI in both groups. Combined AO + MI effects were significantly greater than AO in typically developing children and were greater than both AO and MI in children with DCD. These results demonstrate a clear capacity for different forms of motor simulation in children both with and without DCD. Moreover, combined AO + MI instructions represent an advantageous method for training movements in children with different motor abilities compared with separate AO and MI instructions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-260
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume183
Early online date25 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Motor Skills Disorders
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Observation
Aptitude
Paint

Cite this

@article{315d5cb5f5bc464f8414dd5377334ff2,
title = "Motor imagery during action observation enhances automatic imitation in children with and without developmental coordination disorder",
abstract = "Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by uncoordinated movement relative to age. While action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) can both independently enhance movement skills in children, we report the first study to assess the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) on automatic imitation in children aged 7–12 years both with DCD (n = 12) and without DCD (n = 12). On each trial, participants planned to execute an instructed rhythmical action (face washing or paint brushing). Before responding, participants observed a rhythmical distractor showing the same or a different action with a subtle speed manipulation across trials (fast vs. slow). Automatic imitation was quantified as an imitation bias in subsequent response cycle times. Across blocks of trials, participants engaged in AO, MI, or combined AO + MI during the distractor phase or intentionally imitated the distractor speeds. Although there were no between groups differences, combined AO + MI instructions produced a significantly greater imitation bias (115{\%}) than both AO (109{\%}) and MI (109{\%}), with intentional imitation yielding the strongest effects overall (128{\%}). Within groups analyses revealed a significant bias for AO and MI in both groups. Combined AO + MI effects were significantly greater than AO in typically developing children and were greater than both AO and MI in children with DCD. These results demonstrate a clear capacity for different forms of motor simulation in children both with and without DCD. Moreover, combined AO + MI instructions represent an advantageous method for training movements in children with different motor abilities compared with separate AO and MI instructions.",
author = "Matthew Scott and Jonathan Emerson and John Dixon and Martin Tayler and Daniel Eaves",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "183",
pages = "242--260",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor imagery during action observation enhances automatic imitation in children with and without developmental coordination disorder

AU - Scott, Matthew

AU - Emerson, Jonathan

AU - Dixon, John

AU - Tayler, Martin

AU - Eaves, Daniel

PY - 2019/7/31

Y1 - 2019/7/31

N2 - Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by uncoordinated movement relative to age. While action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) can both independently enhance movement skills in children, we report the first study to assess the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) on automatic imitation in children aged 7–12 years both with DCD (n = 12) and without DCD (n = 12). On each trial, participants planned to execute an instructed rhythmical action (face washing or paint brushing). Before responding, participants observed a rhythmical distractor showing the same or a different action with a subtle speed manipulation across trials (fast vs. slow). Automatic imitation was quantified as an imitation bias in subsequent response cycle times. Across blocks of trials, participants engaged in AO, MI, or combined AO + MI during the distractor phase or intentionally imitated the distractor speeds. Although there were no between groups differences, combined AO + MI instructions produced a significantly greater imitation bias (115%) than both AO (109%) and MI (109%), with intentional imitation yielding the strongest effects overall (128%). Within groups analyses revealed a significant bias for AO and MI in both groups. Combined AO + MI effects were significantly greater than AO in typically developing children and were greater than both AO and MI in children with DCD. These results demonstrate a clear capacity for different forms of motor simulation in children both with and without DCD. Moreover, combined AO + MI instructions represent an advantageous method for training movements in children with different motor abilities compared with separate AO and MI instructions.

AB - Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by uncoordinated movement relative to age. While action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) can both independently enhance movement skills in children, we report the first study to assess the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) on automatic imitation in children aged 7–12 years both with DCD (n = 12) and without DCD (n = 12). On each trial, participants planned to execute an instructed rhythmical action (face washing or paint brushing). Before responding, participants observed a rhythmical distractor showing the same or a different action with a subtle speed manipulation across trials (fast vs. slow). Automatic imitation was quantified as an imitation bias in subsequent response cycle times. Across blocks of trials, participants engaged in AO, MI, or combined AO + MI during the distractor phase or intentionally imitated the distractor speeds. Although there were no between groups differences, combined AO + MI instructions produced a significantly greater imitation bias (115%) than both AO (109%) and MI (109%), with intentional imitation yielding the strongest effects overall (128%). Within groups analyses revealed a significant bias for AO and MI in both groups. Combined AO + MI effects were significantly greater than AO in typically developing children and were greater than both AO and MI in children with DCD. These results demonstrate a clear capacity for different forms of motor simulation in children both with and without DCD. Moreover, combined AO + MI instructions represent an advantageous method for training movements in children with different motor abilities compared with separate AO and MI instructions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063146104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 183

SP - 242

EP - 260

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

ER -