Murder; Manslaughter: Alternative Verdicts: R v Coutts [2006] UKHL 39

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This was an appeal to the House of Lords following the decision of the Court of Appeal not to quash the appellant’s conviction for murder. The 31-year-old victim had been strangled with a pair of tights. Her body had then been kept in a storage unit for several weeks before it was found, badly burned, in woodland. The appellant had been convicted of murder. His contention was that the victim had died during consensual asphyxial sexual intercourse during a sex game. The prosecution argued the case on the basis of intentional killing. At the time, both defence and prosecution counsel were of the view that it would not be in the interests of justice to leave the offence of manslaughter to the jury, the appellant preferring to take his chances with a ‘murder or nothing’ verdict rather than accepting the strong possibility of a manslaughter conviction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-490
Number of pages2
JournalThe Journal of Criminal Law
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Murder; Manslaughter: Alternative Verdicts: R v Coutts [2006] UKHL 39'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this