Name writing ability not length of name is predictive of future academic attainment

Lee Copping, Helen Cramman, Sarah Gott, Helen Gray, Peter Tymms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The Performance Indicators in Primary Schools On Entry Baseline assessment for pupils starting school includes an item which aims to assess how well a pupil writes his or her own name. There is some debate regarding the utility of this measure, on the grounds that name length may constitute bias. Purpose, method and design: The predictive validity of this item and its link to name length was investigated with a view to using this item in further assessments. Previous modest scale work from the USA, suggests that name writing ability is a robust indicator which correlates substantively with other known indicators of later reading whilst remaining independent of name length. This paper greatly expanded the sample size and geographical coverage and, rather than concurrent measures, the predictive validity of the item is assessed. The sample includes children from England, Scotland and Australia (N = 14932), assessed between 2011 and 2013. Potential confounding factors that are analysed include age, geographical region and ethnicity. Findings and conclusions: The evidence suggests that the name writing item is a robust measure, with good predictive validity to future academic outcomes in early reading, phonological awareness and mathematics. The length was not related to the ability to write one’s own name nor was it predictive of future outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalEducational Research
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 May 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Name writing ability not length of name is predictive of future academic attainment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this