PHQ-9:

One factor or two?

Luke Boothroyd, David Dagnan, Steven Muncer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The PHQ-9 has been found to be reliable and valid, but with both a single and two-factor structure suggested in the literature. This measure has not yet been subject to psychometric investigation using Mokken scale analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis were performed on retrospective data from an NHS Trust. CFA found a two-factor structure was a significantly better fit; however, the factors were highly correlated. Mokken analysis suggested that a single scale was viable. The findings support recent research by Gonzalez-Blanch et al. (2018) in suggesting a one factor model is most appropriate for the PHQ-9
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-534
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume271
Early online date7 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Psychometrics
Research

Cite this

Boothroyd, L., Dagnan, D., & Muncer, S. (2019). PHQ-9: One factor or two? Psychiatry Research, 271, 532-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048
Boothroyd, Luke ; Dagnan, David ; Muncer, Steven. / PHQ-9: One factor or two?. In: Psychiatry Research. 2019 ; Vol. 271. pp. 532-534.
@article{2e74ae7cd4bb4beb98f9ba8c3d51ea9e,
title = "PHQ-9:: One factor or two?",
abstract = "The PHQ-9 has been found to be reliable and valid, but with both a single and two-factor structure suggested in the literature. This measure has not yet been subject to psychometric investigation using Mokken scale analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis were performed on retrospective data from an NHS Trust. CFA found a two-factor structure was a significantly better fit; however, the factors were highly correlated. Mokken analysis suggested that a single scale was viable. The findings support recent research by Gonzalez-Blanch et al. (2018) in suggesting a one factor model is most appropriate for the PHQ-9",
author = "Luke Boothroyd and David Dagnan and Steven Muncer",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048",
language = "English",
volume = "271",
pages = "532--534",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

Boothroyd, L, Dagnan, D & Muncer, S 2019, 'PHQ-9: One factor or two?', Psychiatry Research, vol. 271, pp. 532-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048

PHQ-9: One factor or two? / Boothroyd, Luke; Dagnan, David; Muncer, Steven.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 271, 31.01.2019, p. 532-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - PHQ-9:

T2 - One factor or two?

AU - Boothroyd, Luke

AU - Dagnan, David

AU - Muncer, Steven

PY - 2019/1/31

Y1 - 2019/1/31

N2 - The PHQ-9 has been found to be reliable and valid, but with both a single and two-factor structure suggested in the literature. This measure has not yet been subject to psychometric investigation using Mokken scale analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis were performed on retrospective data from an NHS Trust. CFA found a two-factor structure was a significantly better fit; however, the factors were highly correlated. Mokken analysis suggested that a single scale was viable. The findings support recent research by Gonzalez-Blanch et al. (2018) in suggesting a one factor model is most appropriate for the PHQ-9

AB - The PHQ-9 has been found to be reliable and valid, but with both a single and two-factor structure suggested in the literature. This measure has not yet been subject to psychometric investigation using Mokken scale analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis were performed on retrospective data from an NHS Trust. CFA found a two-factor structure was a significantly better fit; however, the factors were highly correlated. Mokken analysis suggested that a single scale was viable. The findings support recent research by Gonzalez-Blanch et al. (2018) in suggesting a one factor model is most appropriate for the PHQ-9

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058148148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048

M3 - Article

VL - 271

SP - 532

EP - 534

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

ER -

Boothroyd L, Dagnan D, Muncer S. PHQ-9: One factor or two? Psychiatry Research. 2019 Jan 31;271:532-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048