Praxis of potentiality: a consideration of spatial disappearance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The dichotomy of space and place is described by humanist geographer Yi-Fu Tuan when he states “what begins as undifferentiated space becomes place as we get to know it better and endow it with value.” 1 However, is that endowment the beginning of dissolution into a utility of representation and value as Baudrillard suggests vis-à-vis the act of naming? 2 What are the implications of “practising space” 3 as de Certeau calls it, and how have artists uncovered this moment of transition, which is ripe with meaning and at the same time on the cusp of disappearance?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMobility and fantasy in visual culture
EditorsL. Johnson
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter9
Number of pages10
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781136747083
ISBN (Print)9780203630181
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Praxis of potentiality: a consideration of spatial disappearance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Lent, M. M. (2013). Praxis of potentiality: a consideration of spatial disappearance. In L. Johnson (Ed.), Mobility and fantasy in visual culture (1 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203630181