Reflections on Norway’s juvenile justice model: A comparative context

John Winterdyk, Georgios Antonopoulos, Ray Corrado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Juvenile delinquency and its relationship to the complex contemporary challenges that confront (certain) young people remain an enigma for many national juvenile justice systems (JJS). One exception to this global trend is Norway, which has experienced low levels of youth crime even though it processes youth within the adult criminal justice system at age 15. With few such exceptions, most industrialised liberal democratic countries have utilised a variety of distinctive JJS separate from their adult criminal justice systems. In this article, the ‘Norwegian model’ is examined to assess whether it is theoretically unique to Norway and, if so, why. The broader political, social and economic contexts appear essential in explaining the success of a JJS embedded in the adult criminal justice system. The article concludes with several policy observations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)-
JournalCrime Prevention and Community Safety
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Crime
Embedded systems
Norway
justice
Economics
juvenile delinquency
offense
trend
economics

Cite this

@article{e124fff73e82443293582cbaee670376,
title = "Reflections on Norway’s juvenile justice model: A comparative context",
abstract = "Juvenile delinquency and its relationship to the complex contemporary challenges that confront (certain) young people remain an enigma for many national juvenile justice systems (JJS). One exception to this global trend is Norway, which has experienced low levels of youth crime even though it processes youth within the adult criminal justice system at age 15. With few such exceptions, most industrialised liberal democratic countries have utilised a variety of distinctive JJS separate from their adult criminal justice systems. In this article, the ‘Norwegian model’ is examined to assess whether it is theoretically unique to Norway and, if so, why. The broader political, social and economic contexts appear essential in explaining the success of a JJS embedded in the adult criminal justice system. The article concludes with several policy observations.",
author = "John Winterdyk and Georgios Antonopoulos and Ray Corrado",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1057/cpcs.2016.3",
language = "English",
pages = "--",
journal = "Crime Prevention and Community Safety",
issn = "1743-4629",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

}

Reflections on Norway’s juvenile justice model: A comparative context. / Winterdyk, John; Antonopoulos, Georgios; Corrado, Ray.

In: Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 15.04.2016, p. -.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections on Norway’s juvenile justice model: A comparative context

AU - Winterdyk, John

AU - Antonopoulos, Georgios

AU - Corrado, Ray

PY - 2016/4/15

Y1 - 2016/4/15

N2 - Juvenile delinquency and its relationship to the complex contemporary challenges that confront (certain) young people remain an enigma for many national juvenile justice systems (JJS). One exception to this global trend is Norway, which has experienced low levels of youth crime even though it processes youth within the adult criminal justice system at age 15. With few such exceptions, most industrialised liberal democratic countries have utilised a variety of distinctive JJS separate from their adult criminal justice systems. In this article, the ‘Norwegian model’ is examined to assess whether it is theoretically unique to Norway and, if so, why. The broader political, social and economic contexts appear essential in explaining the success of a JJS embedded in the adult criminal justice system. The article concludes with several policy observations.

AB - Juvenile delinquency and its relationship to the complex contemporary challenges that confront (certain) young people remain an enigma for many national juvenile justice systems (JJS). One exception to this global trend is Norway, which has experienced low levels of youth crime even though it processes youth within the adult criminal justice system at age 15. With few such exceptions, most industrialised liberal democratic countries have utilised a variety of distinctive JJS separate from their adult criminal justice systems. In this article, the ‘Norwegian model’ is examined to assess whether it is theoretically unique to Norway and, if so, why. The broader political, social and economic contexts appear essential in explaining the success of a JJS embedded in the adult criminal justice system. The article concludes with several policy observations.

U2 - 10.1057/cpcs.2016.3

DO - 10.1057/cpcs.2016.3

M3 - Article

SP - -

JO - Crime Prevention and Community Safety

JF - Crime Prevention and Community Safety

SN - 1743-4629

ER -