Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: a meta-analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016)

Helen Gray, Andrew Lyth, Catherine McKenna, Susan Stothard, Peter Tymms, Lee Copping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A recent study by Baye and Monseur (Large Scale Assess Educ 4:1–16, 2016) using large, international educational data sets suggest that the “greater male variation hypothesis” is well supported. Males are often over-represented at the tails of the ability distribution despite similarity in measures of central tendency and the gradual closing of the attainment gap relative to females. In this study, we replicate and expand Baye and Monseur’s work, and explore greater male variability by country using meta-analysis and meta-regression. While we broadly confirm that variability is greater for males internationally, we find that there is significant heterogeneity between countries, and that much of this can be quantified using variables applicable across these assessments (such as test, year, male–female effect size, mean country score and Global Gender Gap Indicators). While it is still not possible to make any causal conclusions regarding why males are more varied than females in academic assessments, it is possible to show that some national level variables effect the magnitude of this variation. Results and suggestions for further work are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Number of pages40
JournalLarge-scale Assessments in Education
Volume7
Issue number1
Early online date12 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

mathematics
science
regression
gender
ability

Cite this

@article{9fb0458fda9949cbab240d75efce24e5,
title = "Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: a meta-analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016)",
abstract = "A recent study by Baye and Monseur (Large Scale Assess Educ 4:1–16, 2016) using large, international educational data sets suggest that the “greater male variation hypothesis” is well supported. Males are often over-represented at the tails of the ability distribution despite similarity in measures of central tendency and the gradual closing of the attainment gap relative to females. In this study, we replicate and expand Baye and Monseur’s work, and explore greater male variability by country using meta-analysis and meta-regression. While we broadly confirm that variability is greater for males internationally, we find that there is significant heterogeneity between countries, and that much of this can be quantified using variables applicable across these assessments (such as test, year, male–female effect size, mean country score and Global Gender Gap Indicators). While it is still not possible to make any causal conclusions regarding why males are more varied than females in academic assessments, it is possible to show that some national level variables effect the magnitude of this variation. Results and suggestions for further work are discussed.",
author = "Helen Gray and Andrew Lyth and Catherine McKenna and Susan Stothard and Peter Tymms and Lee Copping",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/s40536-019-0070-9",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Large-scale Assessments in Education",
issn = "2196-0739",
publisher = "SpringerOpen",
number = "1",

}

Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: a meta-analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016). / Gray, Helen; Lyth, Andrew; McKenna, Catherine; Stothard, Susan; Tymms, Peter; Copping, Lee.

In: Large-scale Assessments in Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: a meta-analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016)

AU - Gray, Helen

AU - Lyth, Andrew

AU - McKenna, Catherine

AU - Stothard, Susan

AU - Tymms, Peter

AU - Copping, Lee

PY - 2019/2/12

Y1 - 2019/2/12

N2 - A recent study by Baye and Monseur (Large Scale Assess Educ 4:1–16, 2016) using large, international educational data sets suggest that the “greater male variation hypothesis” is well supported. Males are often over-represented at the tails of the ability distribution despite similarity in measures of central tendency and the gradual closing of the attainment gap relative to females. In this study, we replicate and expand Baye and Monseur’s work, and explore greater male variability by country using meta-analysis and meta-regression. While we broadly confirm that variability is greater for males internationally, we find that there is significant heterogeneity between countries, and that much of this can be quantified using variables applicable across these assessments (such as test, year, male–female effect size, mean country score and Global Gender Gap Indicators). While it is still not possible to make any causal conclusions regarding why males are more varied than females in academic assessments, it is possible to show that some national level variables effect the magnitude of this variation. Results and suggestions for further work are discussed.

AB - A recent study by Baye and Monseur (Large Scale Assess Educ 4:1–16, 2016) using large, international educational data sets suggest that the “greater male variation hypothesis” is well supported. Males are often over-represented at the tails of the ability distribution despite similarity in measures of central tendency and the gradual closing of the attainment gap relative to females. In this study, we replicate and expand Baye and Monseur’s work, and explore greater male variability by country using meta-analysis and meta-regression. While we broadly confirm that variability is greater for males internationally, we find that there is significant heterogeneity between countries, and that much of this can be quantified using variables applicable across these assessments (such as test, year, male–female effect size, mean country score and Global Gender Gap Indicators). While it is still not possible to make any causal conclusions regarding why males are more varied than females in academic assessments, it is possible to show that some national level variables effect the magnitude of this variation. Results and suggestions for further work are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068896078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40536-019-0070-9

DO - 10.1186/s40536-019-0070-9

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Large-scale Assessments in Education

JF - Large-scale Assessments in Education

SN - 2196-0739

IS - 1

M1 - 2

ER -