Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: a meta-analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016)

Helen Gray, Andrew Lyth, Catherine McKenna, Susan Stothard, Peter Tymms, Lee Copping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A recent study by Baye and Monseur (Large Scale Assess Educ 4:1–16, 2016) using large, international educational data sets suggest that the “greater male variation hypothesis” is well supported. Males are often over-represented at the tails of the ability distribution despite similarity in measures of central tendency and the gradual closing of the attainment gap relative to females. In this study, we replicate and expand Baye and Monseur’s work, and explore greater male variability by country using meta-analysis and meta-regression. While we broadly confirm that variability is greater for males internationally, we find that there is significant heterogeneity between countries, and that much of this can be quantified using variables applicable across these assessments (such as test, year, male–female effect size, mean country score and Global Gender Gap Indicators). While it is still not possible to make any causal conclusions regarding why males are more varied than females in academic assessments, it is possible to show that some national level variables effect the magnitude of this variation. Results and suggestions for further work are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Number of pages40
JournalLarge-scale Assessments in Education
Volume7
Issue number1
Early online date12 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in variability across nations in reading, mathematics and science: a meta-analytic extension of Baye and Monseur (2016)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this