Smoke and Mirrors: The Influence of Cultural Inertia on Social and Economic Development in a Polycentric Urban Region

Tony Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article explores the potential of employing the concept of ‘cultural inertia’ to explain why areas are slow fully to recover from a period of industrial restructuring in polycentric urban regions. Cultural inertia produces and reproduces tolerances and intolerances to change. It is shown that taken-for-granted assumptions about what constrains progress in achieving recovery (in comparison with other areas) may actually be false. This article draws on a study of social and economic change in Tees Valley, a sub-region of North East England. It reports on 28 two-hour interviews and three focus groups with key stakeholders. It is concluded that catalytic change could come about in industrial restructuring areas, but only if stakeholders build on strengths. The danger lies in polycentric areas’ attempts to emulate metropolitan areas because of a fundamental lack of belief in existing strengths which can be exploited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1037-1057
JournalUrban Studies
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

industrial restructuring
urban region
social development
inertia
stakeholder
economic development
metropolitan area
tolerance
economics
restructuring
valley
economic change
social change
agglomeration area
lack
interview
Group
comparison

Cite this

@article{92add18df1da4b1983cd92a4069e4fb4,
title = "Smoke and Mirrors: The Influence of Cultural Inertia on Social and Economic Development in a Polycentric Urban Region",
abstract = "This article explores the potential of employing the concept of ‘cultural inertia’ to explain why areas are slow fully to recover from a period of industrial restructuring in polycentric urban regions. Cultural inertia produces and reproduces tolerances and intolerances to change. It is shown that taken-for-granted assumptions about what constrains progress in achieving recovery (in comparison with other areas) may actually be false. This article draws on a study of social and economic change in Tees Valley, a sub-region of North East England. It reports on 28 two-hour interviews and three focus groups with key stakeholders. It is concluded that catalytic change could come about in industrial restructuring areas, but only if stakeholders build on strengths. The danger lies in polycentric areas’ attempts to emulate metropolitan areas because of a fundamental lack of belief in existing strengths which can be exploited.",
author = "Tony Chapman",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/0042098010375993",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1037--1057",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

Smoke and Mirrors: The Influence of Cultural Inertia on Social and Economic Development in a Polycentric Urban Region. / Chapman, Tony.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2011, p. 1037-1057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoke and Mirrors: The Influence of Cultural Inertia on Social and Economic Development in a Polycentric Urban Region

AU - Chapman, Tony

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article explores the potential of employing the concept of ‘cultural inertia’ to explain why areas are slow fully to recover from a period of industrial restructuring in polycentric urban regions. Cultural inertia produces and reproduces tolerances and intolerances to change. It is shown that taken-for-granted assumptions about what constrains progress in achieving recovery (in comparison with other areas) may actually be false. This article draws on a study of social and economic change in Tees Valley, a sub-region of North East England. It reports on 28 two-hour interviews and three focus groups with key stakeholders. It is concluded that catalytic change could come about in industrial restructuring areas, but only if stakeholders build on strengths. The danger lies in polycentric areas’ attempts to emulate metropolitan areas because of a fundamental lack of belief in existing strengths which can be exploited.

AB - This article explores the potential of employing the concept of ‘cultural inertia’ to explain why areas are slow fully to recover from a period of industrial restructuring in polycentric urban regions. Cultural inertia produces and reproduces tolerances and intolerances to change. It is shown that taken-for-granted assumptions about what constrains progress in achieving recovery (in comparison with other areas) may actually be false. This article draws on a study of social and economic change in Tees Valley, a sub-region of North East England. It reports on 28 two-hour interviews and three focus groups with key stakeholders. It is concluded that catalytic change could come about in industrial restructuring areas, but only if stakeholders build on strengths. The danger lies in polycentric areas’ attempts to emulate metropolitan areas because of a fundamental lack of belief in existing strengths which can be exploited.

UR - http://usj.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0042098010375993

U2 - 10.1177/0042098010375993

DO - 10.1177/0042098010375993

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 1037

EP - 1057

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 5

ER -