Abstract
This book is about the destruction of art, both in terms of objects that have been destroyed - lost in fires, floods or vandalism - and the general concept of art operating through object and form. Through re-examinations of such events as the Momart warehouse fire in 2004 and the activities of art thief Stéphane Breitwieser, the book proposes an idea of solvent form hinging on the dual meaning in the words <i>solvent</i> and <i>solvency,</i> whereby art, while attempting to make secure or fixed, simultaneously undoes and destroys through its inception. Ultimately, the book questions what is it that may be perceived in the destruction of art and how we understand it, and further how it might be linked to a more general failure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Manchester |
| Publisher | Manchester University Press |
| Number of pages | 168 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781526129246 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Final versions can never be self-archived on personal or department website, institutional or subject repository and social media http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/openmonographs/Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Solvent form: Art and destruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver