Abstract
This article examines the work of critically neglected colonial writer, essayist and cultural
critic Bertram Mitford, with particular reference to his novel The Sign of the Spider
(1896). Taking an economic approach to fin de siècle imperial politics, I argue that
Mitford offers an important yet sadly overlooked counter-narrative of imperial
expansionism. To an extent, Mitford undermines figures like H. Rider Haggard whose
narratives betray a particular insensitivity to the depredatory conditions of Empire.
Exploring Derridean formulations of Hauntology, I suggest that Mitford’s success lies
partly in his ‘spectralisation’ of fiscal realities. The narrative, featuring apparitions of
erstwhile economies, allows for a dialogue between past and present that problematizes
Britain’s position in global markets at the fin de siècle. I further illustrate that Mitford’s
depictions of anthropophagy offer a scathing cultural critique of late nineteenth-century
imperial enterprise. From the indigenous tribes in an evolutionary state of economic
nature to the merchant or financier at the end point of our financial evolution, ‘economic
man’ shares a primal, archetypal desire to consume. In conclusion, I suggest Mitford
attempted both to destabilise the popular myth of Britain’s ‘beneficent’ patronage of
occupied South Africa, and bravely to undertake the work of inheriting the legacy of
Britain’s predatory economic past.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 6-21 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Victorian Network |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Aug 2009 |
Externally published | Yes |