Standard of Proof: Direction to Jury: R v Stephens (Alan Edwin) [2002] EWCA Crim 1529

Annabelle James

doi:10.1177/002201830206600602

Standard of Proof: Direction to Jury: R v Stephens (Alan Edwin) [2002] EWCA Crim 1529

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The appellant, S, had been convicted at Wood Green Crown Court on 16February 200 I of wounding with intent, contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, s. 18, and sentenced to four years' imprisonment. He was appealing against his conviction on the grounds that, inter alia, the judge had erred in his replies to the jury regarding the burden and standard of proof when asked for clarification following the summing-up.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	473-474
Number of pages	2
Journal	The Journal of Criminal Law
Volume	66
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/002201830206600602
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2002
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1177/002201830206600602

Cite this

@article{a8c7da6a0cc54912851fbd1ff19d2702,

title = "Standard of Proof: Direction to Jury: R v Stephens (Alan Edwin) [2002] EWCA Crim 1529",

abstract = "The appellant, S, had been convicted at Wood Green Crown Court on 16February 200 I of wounding with intent, contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, s. 18, and sentenced to four years' imprisonment. He was appealing against his conviction on the grounds that, inter alia, the judge had erred in his replies to the jury regarding the burden and standard of proof when asked for clarification following the summing-up.",

author = "Annabelle James",

year = "2002",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/002201830206600602",

language = "English",

volume = "66",

pages = "473--474",

journal = "The Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "0022-0183",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standard of Proof: Direction to Jury

T2 - R v Stephens (Alan Edwin) [2002] EWCA Crim 1529

AU - James, Annabelle

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - The appellant, S, had been convicted at Wood Green Crown Court on 16February 200 I of wounding with intent, contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, s. 18, and sentenced to four years' imprisonment. He was appealing against his conviction on the grounds that, inter alia, the judge had erred in his replies to the jury regarding the burden and standard of proof when asked for clarification following the summing-up.

AB - The appellant, S, had been convicted at Wood Green Crown Court on 16February 200 I of wounding with intent, contrary to the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, s. 18, and sentenced to four years' imprisonment. He was appealing against his conviction on the grounds that, inter alia, the judge had erred in his replies to the jury regarding the burden and standard of proof when asked for clarification following the summing-up.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002201830206600602

U2 - 10.1177/002201830206600602

DO - 10.1177/002201830206600602

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-0183

VL - 66

SP - 473

EP - 474

JO - The Journal of Criminal Law

JF - The Journal of Criminal Law

IS - 6

ER -

Standard of Proof: Direction to Jury: R v Stephens (Alan Edwin) [2002] EWCA Crim 1529

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this