The Psychometric Evaluation of Human Life Histories

A Reply to Figueredo, Cabeza de Baca, Black, Garcia, Fernandes, Wolf, and Woodley (2015)

Lee Copping, Anne C. Campbell, Steven Muncer, G. B. (George) Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A recent critique of Copping, Campbell, and Muncer raised several issues concerning the validity of psychometric assessment techniques in the study of life history (LH) strategies. In this reply, some of our key concerns about relying on aggregated psy- chometric measures are explained, and we raise questions generally regarding the use of higher order factor structures. Responses to some of the statistical issues raised by Figueredo et al. are also detailed. We stand by our original conclusions and call for more careful consideration of instruments used to evaluate hypotheses derived from LH theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)-
JournalEvolutionary Psychology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Life History Traits

Cite this

@article{dec3f8ca7be746f68cc5a48cd24b4cd3,
title = "The Psychometric Evaluation of Human Life Histories: A Reply to Figueredo, Cabeza de Baca, Black, Garcia, Fernandes, Wolf, and Woodley (2015)",
abstract = "A recent critique of Copping, Campbell, and Muncer raised several issues concerning the validity of psychometric assessment techniques in the study of life history (LH) strategies. In this reply, some of our key concerns about relying on aggregated psy- chometric measures are explained, and we raise questions generally regarding the use of higher order factor structures. Responses to some of the statistical issues raised by Figueredo et al. are also detailed. We stand by our original conclusions and call for more careful consideration of instruments used to evaluate hypotheses derived from LH theory.",
author = "Lee Copping and Campbell, {Anne C.} and Steven Muncer and Richardson, {G. B. (George)}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1474704916663727",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "--",
journal = "Evolutionary Psychology",
issn = "1474-7049",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

The Psychometric Evaluation of Human Life Histories : A Reply to Figueredo, Cabeza de Baca, Black, Garcia, Fernandes, Wolf, and Woodley (2015). / Copping, Lee; Campbell, Anne C.; Muncer, Steven; Richardson, G. B. (George).

In: Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. -.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Psychometric Evaluation of Human Life Histories

T2 - A Reply to Figueredo, Cabeza de Baca, Black, Garcia, Fernandes, Wolf, and Woodley (2015)

AU - Copping, Lee

AU - Campbell, Anne C.

AU - Muncer, Steven

AU - Richardson, G. B. (George)

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - A recent critique of Copping, Campbell, and Muncer raised several issues concerning the validity of psychometric assessment techniques in the study of life history (LH) strategies. In this reply, some of our key concerns about relying on aggregated psy- chometric measures are explained, and we raise questions generally regarding the use of higher order factor structures. Responses to some of the statistical issues raised by Figueredo et al. are also detailed. We stand by our original conclusions and call for more careful consideration of instruments used to evaluate hypotheses derived from LH theory.

AB - A recent critique of Copping, Campbell, and Muncer raised several issues concerning the validity of psychometric assessment techniques in the study of life history (LH) strategies. In this reply, some of our key concerns about relying on aggregated psy- chometric measures are explained, and we raise questions generally regarding the use of higher order factor structures. Responses to some of the statistical issues raised by Figueredo et al. are also detailed. We stand by our original conclusions and call for more careful consideration of instruments used to evaluate hypotheses derived from LH theory.

U2 - 10.1177/1474704916663727

DO - 10.1177/1474704916663727

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - -

JO - Evolutionary Psychology

JF - Evolutionary Psychology

SN - 1474-7049

IS - 1

ER -