Abstract
A recent critique of Copping, Campbell, and Muncer raised several issues concerning the validity of psychometric assessment
techniques in the study of life history (LH) strategies. In this reply, some of our key concerns about relying on aggregated psy-
chometric measures are explained, and we raise questions generally regarding the use of higher order factor structures.
Responses to some of the statistical issues raised by Figueredo et al. are also detailed. We stand by our original conclusions and
call for more careful consideration of instruments used to evaluate hypotheses derived from LH theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | - |
| Journal | Evolutionary Psychology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Psychometric Evaluation of Human Life Histories: A Reply to Figueredo, Cabeza de Baca, Black, Garcia, Fernandes, Wolf, and Woodley (2015)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver