The Response of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs to Functionally Loaded Positions

Lyndsay A. Alexander, Elizabeth Hancock, Ioannis Agouris, Francis W. Smith, Alasdair Macsween

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Study design: Asymptomatic volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how different positions affect lumbar intervertebral discs. Objective: To quantify sagittal migration of the lumbar nucleus pulposus in 6 functional positions. Summary of background data: Previous studies of the intervertebral disc response in the sagittal plane were limited to imaging of recumbent positions. Developments of upright magnetic resonance imaging permit investigation of functional weight-bearing positions. Methods: T2-weighted sagittal scans of the L1-L2 to L5-S1 discs were taken of 11 volunteers in standing, sitting (upright, flexed, and in extension), supine, and prone extension. Sagittal migration of the nucleus pulposus was measured (mm) as distance from anterior disc boundary to peak pixel intensity. Lumbar lordosis (Cobb angle) was measured in each position. Results: Fifteen comparisons between positions showed significant positional effects (14 at L4-L5, L5-S1, the most mobile segments). Prone extension and supine lying induced significantly less posterior migration than sitting. Flexed and upright sitting, significantly more than standing at L4-L5, as did flexed sitting compared with extended. Conclusion: These results support for the first time the validity of clinical assumptions about disc behavior in functional positions: sitting postures may increase risk of posterior derangement, and prone and supine may be therapeutic for symptoms caused by posterior disc displacement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1508-1512
JournalSpine
Volume32
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Intervertebral Disc
Posture
Volunteers
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Lordosis
Weight-Bearing
Nucleus Pulposus
Therapeutics

Cite this

Alexander, Lyndsay A. ; Hancock, Elizabeth ; Agouris, Ioannis ; Smith, Francis W. ; Macsween, Alasdair. / The Response of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs to Functionally Loaded Positions. In: Spine. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 14. pp. 1508-1512.
@article{4ec213f330b94c019fd0d344f4d66728,
title = "The Response of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs to Functionally Loaded Positions",
abstract = "Study design: Asymptomatic volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how different positions affect lumbar intervertebral discs. Objective: To quantify sagittal migration of the lumbar nucleus pulposus in 6 functional positions. Summary of background data: Previous studies of the intervertebral disc response in the sagittal plane were limited to imaging of recumbent positions. Developments of upright magnetic resonance imaging permit investigation of functional weight-bearing positions. Methods: T2-weighted sagittal scans of the L1-L2 to L5-S1 discs were taken of 11 volunteers in standing, sitting (upright, flexed, and in extension), supine, and prone extension. Sagittal migration of the nucleus pulposus was measured (mm) as distance from anterior disc boundary to peak pixel intensity. Lumbar lordosis (Cobb angle) was measured in each position. Results: Fifteen comparisons between positions showed significant positional effects (14 at L4-L5, L5-S1, the most mobile segments). Prone extension and supine lying induced significantly less posterior migration than sitting. Flexed and upright sitting, significantly more than standing at L4-L5, as did flexed sitting compared with extended. Conclusion: These results support for the first time the validity of clinical assumptions about disc behavior in functional positions: sitting postures may increase risk of posterior derangement, and prone and supine may be therapeutic for symptoms caused by posterior disc displacement.",
author = "Alexander, {Lyndsay A.} and Elizabeth Hancock and Ioannis Agouris and Smith, {Francis W.} and Alasdair Macsween",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067dccb",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1508--1512",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins",
number = "14",

}

The Response of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs to Functionally Loaded Positions. / Alexander, Lyndsay A.; Hancock, Elizabeth; Agouris, Ioannis; Smith, Francis W.; Macsween, Alasdair.

In: Spine, Vol. 32, No. 14, 01.06.2007, p. 1508-1512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Response of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs to Functionally Loaded Positions

AU - Alexander, Lyndsay A.

AU - Hancock, Elizabeth

AU - Agouris, Ioannis

AU - Smith, Francis W.

AU - Macsween, Alasdair

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Study design: Asymptomatic volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how different positions affect lumbar intervertebral discs. Objective: To quantify sagittal migration of the lumbar nucleus pulposus in 6 functional positions. Summary of background data: Previous studies of the intervertebral disc response in the sagittal plane were limited to imaging of recumbent positions. Developments of upright magnetic resonance imaging permit investigation of functional weight-bearing positions. Methods: T2-weighted sagittal scans of the L1-L2 to L5-S1 discs were taken of 11 volunteers in standing, sitting (upright, flexed, and in extension), supine, and prone extension. Sagittal migration of the nucleus pulposus was measured (mm) as distance from anterior disc boundary to peak pixel intensity. Lumbar lordosis (Cobb angle) was measured in each position. Results: Fifteen comparisons between positions showed significant positional effects (14 at L4-L5, L5-S1, the most mobile segments). Prone extension and supine lying induced significantly less posterior migration than sitting. Flexed and upright sitting, significantly more than standing at L4-L5, as did flexed sitting compared with extended. Conclusion: These results support for the first time the validity of clinical assumptions about disc behavior in functional positions: sitting postures may increase risk of posterior derangement, and prone and supine may be therapeutic for symptoms caused by posterior disc displacement.

AB - Study design: Asymptomatic volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging to investigate how different positions affect lumbar intervertebral discs. Objective: To quantify sagittal migration of the lumbar nucleus pulposus in 6 functional positions. Summary of background data: Previous studies of the intervertebral disc response in the sagittal plane were limited to imaging of recumbent positions. Developments of upright magnetic resonance imaging permit investigation of functional weight-bearing positions. Methods: T2-weighted sagittal scans of the L1-L2 to L5-S1 discs were taken of 11 volunteers in standing, sitting (upright, flexed, and in extension), supine, and prone extension. Sagittal migration of the nucleus pulposus was measured (mm) as distance from anterior disc boundary to peak pixel intensity. Lumbar lordosis (Cobb angle) was measured in each position. Results: Fifteen comparisons between positions showed significant positional effects (14 at L4-L5, L5-S1, the most mobile segments). Prone extension and supine lying induced significantly less posterior migration than sitting. Flexed and upright sitting, significantly more than standing at L4-L5, as did flexed sitting compared with extended. Conclusion: These results support for the first time the validity of clinical assumptions about disc behavior in functional positions: sitting postures may increase risk of posterior derangement, and prone and supine may be therapeutic for symptoms caused by posterior disc displacement.

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067dccb

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318067dccb

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1508

EP - 1512

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 14

ER -