Abstract
Objective: To compare the post-intervention time-course changes in Active Knee Extension (AKE) and Active Lumbar Flexion (ALF) range of motion in response to unilateral posterior–anterior (UPA) mobilizations of the lumbar spine (L4/5 zygapophyseal).
Methods: Twenty-four asymptomatic participants (maleness: 0.58, age [mean ± standard deviation]: 32 ± 8 y, body mass index 25.9 ± 2.6 kg.m2), were recruited to a fully controlled crossover trial. Following either the intervention (L4/5 zygapophyseal mobilizations) or control, participants immediately performed the AKE and ALF tests, which were also performed at baseline. Subsequent tests were made at intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 and 60 minutes.
Results: After adjustment for baseline (mean AKE: 37.2 from full extension, mean ALF: 14.37 cm), sex and age, UPA lumbar mobilizations had a most likely moderate effect on AKE (9.8 closer to full extension; ±1.9) and a likely moderate effect on ALF (1.34 cm; ±90% confidence limits 0.43). The magnitude of the AKE effect became most likely small 20-minutes post-treatment (5.3; ±1.7) and possibly small/ possibly trivial 60-minutes post-treatment (2.1; ±1.4). For ALF, the magnitude of the effect became most likely small 15-minutes post-treatment (0.76; ±0.25), possibly small/ possibly trivial 25-minutes post-treatment (0.38; ±0.18), and likely trivial 60-minutes post-treatment (0.26; ±1.8).
Discussion: UPA lumbar mobilizations increased lumbar ROM and hamstring extensibility by a moderate magnitude, with the effect reducing after 10–20-minutes post-treatment. Clinicians should consider these time-course changes when applying UPA lumbar mobilizations.
Methods: Twenty-four asymptomatic participants (maleness: 0.58, age [mean ± standard deviation]: 32 ± 8 y, body mass index 25.9 ± 2.6 kg.m2), were recruited to a fully controlled crossover trial. Following either the intervention (L4/5 zygapophyseal mobilizations) or control, participants immediately performed the AKE and ALF tests, which were also performed at baseline. Subsequent tests were made at intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 and 60 minutes.
Results: After adjustment for baseline (mean AKE: 37.2 from full extension, mean ALF: 14.37 cm), sex and age, UPA lumbar mobilizations had a most likely moderate effect on AKE (9.8 closer to full extension; ±1.9) and a likely moderate effect on ALF (1.34 cm; ±90% confidence limits 0.43). The magnitude of the AKE effect became most likely small 20-minutes post-treatment (5.3; ±1.7) and possibly small/ possibly trivial 60-minutes post-treatment (2.1; ±1.4). For ALF, the magnitude of the effect became most likely small 15-minutes post-treatment (0.76; ±0.25), possibly small/ possibly trivial 25-minutes post-treatment (0.38; ±0.18), and likely trivial 60-minutes post-treatment (0.26; ±1.8).
Discussion: UPA lumbar mobilizations increased lumbar ROM and hamstring extensibility by a moderate magnitude, with the effect reducing after 10–20-minutes post-treatment. Clinicians should consider these time-course changes when applying UPA lumbar mobilizations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy |
Early online date | 13 Nov 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 13 Nov 2018 |