Transforming carbon-intensive coal-fired power plants into negative emission technologies via biomass-fired calcium looping retrofit

Calcium looping is a promising CO2 capture technology due to reduced energy and economic penalties compared to mature solvent scrubbing technologies. It also can enable negative CO2 emissions when biomass is used to drive the sorbent regeneration process in the calciner. However, the trade-off between the energy, economic and environmental performance under different biomass co-firing fractions in the calciner and process operating scenarios has not yet been well understood. This study examined the potential for transforming a 580 MWel coal-fired power plant into a negative CO2 emitter via retrofit of calcium looping with biomass co-firing in the calciner. High-fidelity process models were developed in Aspen Plus and used to analyse the effect of biomass co-firing fraction, CO2 capture rate in the carbonator, and the fraction of flue gas fed to the carbonator on the techno-economic performance indicators. The results revealed that co-firing 30% biomass with coal in the calciner was sufficient for the retrofitted process to achieve negative CO2 emissions (−3.9 gCO2/kWelh). In this scenario, the levelized cost of electricity was 5% lower (81.1 €/MWelh) than that in the reference retrofit scenario without biomass co-firing (85.4 €/MWelh) at a carbon tax of 100 €/tCO2. Further improvement to the techno-economic performance was achieved by reducing the amount of CO2 captured in the carbonator by reducing either the CO2 capture rate (81.1 €/tCO2) or the amount of flue gas processed (80.4 €/tCO2). Although this was achieved at the expense of the increased specific CO2 emissions to 65.2 gCO2/kWelh and 109.0 gCO2/kWelh, respectively, the net specific emissions were still about 90% lower than those of the unabated host plant (792.3 gCO2/kWelh). This study demonstrated that depending on design priorities, biomass co-firing in the calciner can transform the existing coal-fired power plants into negative CO2 emission technologies or improve the process techno-economic viability.