Using Normalization Process Theory as a practical tool across the life course of a qualitative research project

Rebekah McNaughton, Alison Steven, Janet Shucksmith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Drawing on work that aimed to understand factors influencing experience of and engagement with the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check Program, this article discusses how Normalization Process Theory was used throughout the life course of a research project. As a relatively new theory, Normalization Process Theory is still being refined and much work undertaken to develop interactive tools and “test” the utility of it. Although there is little published critique of the theory, two main issues have arisen in the literature: (a) difficulties ensuring interpretation of constructs are congruent to the original theory and (b) the intensity of translation work to contextualize the theory to individual settings. These issues are explored in this article by examining the processes undertaken to translate Normalization Process Theory so that it was usable to shape a qualitative research project from design to analysis and interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQualitative Health Research
Early online date26 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
National Health Programs
Research Design
Health
Research

Cite this

@article{5e934c93bbc6443bb187bcffbbc06ff1,
title = "Using Normalization Process Theory as a practical tool across the life course of a qualitative research project",
abstract = "Drawing on work that aimed to understand factors influencing experience of and engagement with the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check Program, this article discusses how Normalization Process Theory was used throughout the life course of a research project. As a relatively new theory, Normalization Process Theory is still being refined and much work undertaken to develop interactive tools and “test” the utility of it. Although there is little published critique of the theory, two main issues have arisen in the literature: (a) difficulties ensuring interpretation of constructs are congruent to the original theory and (b) the intensity of translation work to contextualize the theory to individual settings. These issues are explored in this article by examining the processes undertaken to translate Normalization Process Theory so that it was usable to shape a qualitative research project from design to analysis and interpretation.",
author = "Rebekah McNaughton and Alison Steven and Janet Shucksmith",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1177/1049732319863420",
language = "English",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1049-7323",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

Using Normalization Process Theory as a practical tool across the life course of a qualitative research project. / McNaughton, Rebekah; Steven, Alison; Shucksmith, Janet.

In: Qualitative Health Research, 26.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Normalization Process Theory as a practical tool across the life course of a qualitative research project

AU - McNaughton, Rebekah

AU - Steven, Alison

AU - Shucksmith, Janet

PY - 2019/7/26

Y1 - 2019/7/26

N2 - Drawing on work that aimed to understand factors influencing experience of and engagement with the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check Program, this article discusses how Normalization Process Theory was used throughout the life course of a research project. As a relatively new theory, Normalization Process Theory is still being refined and much work undertaken to develop interactive tools and “test” the utility of it. Although there is little published critique of the theory, two main issues have arisen in the literature: (a) difficulties ensuring interpretation of constructs are congruent to the original theory and (b) the intensity of translation work to contextualize the theory to individual settings. These issues are explored in this article by examining the processes undertaken to translate Normalization Process Theory so that it was usable to shape a qualitative research project from design to analysis and interpretation.

AB - Drawing on work that aimed to understand factors influencing experience of and engagement with the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check Program, this article discusses how Normalization Process Theory was used throughout the life course of a research project. As a relatively new theory, Normalization Process Theory is still being refined and much work undertaken to develop interactive tools and “test” the utility of it. Although there is little published critique of the theory, two main issues have arisen in the literature: (a) difficulties ensuring interpretation of constructs are congruent to the original theory and (b) the intensity of translation work to contextualize the theory to individual settings. These issues are explored in this article by examining the processes undertaken to translate Normalization Process Theory so that it was usable to shape a qualitative research project from design to analysis and interpretation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070400064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049732319863420

DO - 10.1177/1049732319863420

M3 - Article

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1049-7323

ER -